Logo image
Comparing Normative, Anecdotal, and Statistical Risk Evidence to Discourage Tanning Bed Use
Journal article   Open access   Peer reviewed

Comparing Normative, Anecdotal, and Statistical Risk Evidence to Discourage Tanning Bed Use

Kathryn Greene, Shelly Campo and Smita C Banerjee
Communication quarterly, Vol.58(2), pp.111-132
05/25/2010
DOI: 10.1080/01463371003773366
url
https://doi.org/10.1080/01463371003773366View
Published (Version of record) Open Access

Abstract

This study compared the efficacy of normative messages to other traditional persuasive messages using anecdotal or statistical risk evidence. Messages were compared regarding their impact on beliefs, attitudes, and normative perceptions regarding tanning bed use. Undergraduate students (N = 744) at a large Northeastern university were randomly assigned to 1 of 4 message conditions: normative, anecdotal, statistical risk, or no-message control. Results from this study indicate that, although evidence types do not directly influence behavioral intention, some do impact message perceptions, normative perceptions, severity, and health beliefs about the safety of tanning beds and their negative consequences. Normative evidence was superior to other evidence types in influencing normative perceptions of other college students' and friends' beliefs that tanning beds are safe, some messages ratings, and beliefs about health protection and consequences of tanning beds. Anecdotal messages were best at altering severity and amount of invested mental effort, but statistical messages overall performed the worst. Skin color effects and gender differences were also found.
Evidence Skin Cancer Social Norms Tanning Beds Sun Persuasive Messages

Details

Metrics

Logo image