Journal article
Comparison Between Clinician-Assisted and Fully Automated Procedures for Obtaining a Voice Range Profile
Journal of speech, language, and hearing research, Vol.38(3), pp.526-535
06/01/1995
DOI: 10.1044/jshr.3803.526
PMID: 7674644
Abstract
A comparison was made between two methods of obtaining a voice range profile. One method was traditional, involving a clinician who gave instructions, motivated the subject to achieve the greatest intensity range, and determined when the goal was achieved. The second method was completely automated, involving the use of a videotape for instruction and a computer for elicitation and evaluation. Ten men and 10 women with normal voices participated as subjects in the study, and a counterbalanced design was used. Results indicated that there is no obvious preference for the use of either method, although considerable individual differences are noted.
Details
- Title: Subtitle
- Comparison Between Clinician-Assisted and Fully Automated Procedures for Obtaining a Voice Range Profile
- Creators
- Ingo R. Titze - Denver Center for the Performing ArtsDarrell Wong - Denver Center for the Performing ArtsMartin A. Milder - Denver Center for the Performing ArtsSusan R. Hensley - Denver Center for the Performing ArtsLorraine O. Ramig - Denver Center for the Performing Arts
- Resource Type
- Journal article
- Publication Details
- Journal of speech, language, and hearing research, Vol.38(3), pp.526-535
- DOI
- 10.1044/jshr.3803.526
- PMID
- 7674644
- ISSN
- 1092-4388
- eISSN
- 1558-9102
- Number of pages
- 10
- Language
- English
- Date published
- 06/01/1995
- Academic Unit
- School of Music; Communication Sciences and Disorders
- Record Identifier
- 9984719748802771
Metrics
4 Record Views