Comparison of Radial Artery Occlusion Following Transradial Access for Percutaneous Coronary Intervention Using Sheath-based versus Sheathless Technique

Ala Mohsen; Musab Alqasrawi; Ghanshyam Palamaner Subash Shantha; Chris DeZorzi; Sidakpal Panaich

doi:10.1038/s41598-018-30462-1

Back

Comparison of Radial Artery Occlusion Following Transradial Access for Percutaneous Coronary Intervention Using Sheath-based versus Sheathless Technique

Journal article

Open access

Peer reviewed

Comparison of Radial Artery Occlusion Following Transradial Access for Percutaneous Coronary Intervention Using Sheath-based versus Sheathless Technique

Ala Mohsen, Musab Alqasrawi, Ghanshyam Palamaner Subash Shantha, Chris DeZorzi and Sidakpal Panaich

Scientific reports, Vol.8(1), pp.1-7

08/13/2018

DOI: 10.1038/s41598-018-30462-1

PMID: 30104697

Files and links (2)

pdf

s41598-018-30462-1974.82 kBDownload View

Published (Version of record)CC BY V4.0, Open Access

url

https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-018-30462-1View

Published (Version of record)Scientific Reports volume 8, Article number: 12026 (2018)

Abstract

We compared the risk of radial artery occlusion (RAO) in patients undergoing coronary intervention with introducer sheath (SG) or without introducer sheath (SLG). 1251 consecutive patients, from 2 tertiary care center in Pennsylvania, USA, undergoing percutaneous coronary interventions (PCI) between 2008-2013 formed the study cohort (SLG: 161 patients, SG: 1090 patients). Radial artery patency was assessed using plethysmography. The association between sheath use and RAO was assessed using unadjusted, adjusted and propensity macthed logistic regression analyses. Mean age: 65 years, men: 63%, diabetics: 37%. SG was associated with lower RAO at band removal [unadjusted (OR: 0.31, 95% CI: 0.21-0.46), adjusted (OR: 0.10, 95% CI: 0.05-0.20) and propensity matched (OR: 0.20, 95% CI: 0.13-0.32)], at 24 hours [unadjusted (OR: 0.20, 95% CI: 0.12-0.34), adjusted (OR: 0.12, 95% CI: 0.06-0.24) and propensity matched (OR: 0.13, 95% CI: 0.07-0.25)] and 30 days [unadjusted (OR: 0.28, 95% CI: 0.14-0.54), adjusted (OR: 0.22, 95% CI: 0.10-0.50) and propensity matched (OR: 0.18, 95% CI: 0.10-0.40)], compared to SLG. Sheath use during radial access for PCI is associated with less RAO. It is unclear if use of introducer sheath during radial access for PCI reduces incidence of RAO. In this prospective cohort study involving 1251 concecutive patients undergoing PCI via radial access between 2008-2013, we assessed the difference in incidence of RAO between the SG (n = 1090) and the SLG (n = 161 patients) groups. SG group experienced lower incidence of RAO at band removal, 24 hours and 30 days post PCI in the unadjusted, adjusted, and propensity matched analyses compared to the SLG group. In conclusion sheath use during radial access for PCI is associated with less RAO.

MULTIDISCIPLINARY SCIENCES

PATENCY

Occlusion

Health risk assessment

Article

OAfund

Details

Title: Subtitle: Comparison of Radial Artery Occlusion Following Transradial Access for Percutaneous Coronary Intervention Using Sheath-based versus Sheathless Technique
Creators: Ala Mohsen
Musab Alqasrawi
Ghanshyam Palamaner Subash Shantha
Chris DeZorzi
Sidakpal Panaich - University of Iowa, Internal Medicine
Resource Type: Journal article
Publication Details: Scientific reports, Vol.8(1), pp.1-7
Publisher: NATURE PUBLISHING GROUP; LONDON
DOI: 10.1038/s41598-018-30462-1
PMID: 30104697
ISSN: 2045-2322
eISSN: 2045-2322
Number of pages: 7
Language: English
Date published: 08/13/2018
Academic Unit: Internal Medicine
Record Identifier: 9983561170002771

Metrics

39 File views/ downloads

25 Record Views

9 Times Cited - Web of Science

See more details