Logo image
Compressing neonatal-perinatal medicine fellowship training: a critical appraisal of the American Board of Pediatrics proposed 2-year pathway
Journal article   Open access   Peer reviewed

Compressing neonatal-perinatal medicine fellowship training: a critical appraisal of the American Board of Pediatrics proposed 2-year pathway

Brooke Vergales, Melissa Scala, Christie Bruno, Cynthia Crabtree, Megan Gray, Suma Hoffman, Courtney McLean, Deirdre O'Reilly, Vilmaris Quinones Cardona, Erynn M Bergner, …
Journal of perinatology
06/03/2026
DOI: 10.1038/s41372-026-02743-5
PMCID: PMC13290477
PMID: 42236995
url
https://doi.org/10.1038/s41372-026-02743-5View
Published (Version of record) Open Access

Abstract

The American Board of Pediatrics (ABP) has proposed a competency-based fellowship model offering a 2-year clinical pathway with 18 training blocks and no scholarly requirement. This position statement, representing neonatal-perinatal medicine (NPM) training program directors, division leaders, and key stakeholders, contends that the model is not viable for NPM training. Compressing 18 clinical blocks into 24 months would require approximately 3500 annual training hours, nearly double a sustainable NICU workload, approaching Accreditation Council for Graduate Medical Education duty-hour limits, while reducing didactic education by one-third. Survey data from 110 of 111 NPM programs show 76% opposition. Concerns include trainee wellness, reduction in program complement, workforce and funding implications, and the erosion of scholarly training essential to advancing neonatal care. We propose alternatives, including a 2-year residency + 3-year fellowship (2 + 3) pathway and restructured residency tracks, addressing competency gaps while preserving training quality, duration, and collaborative governance.

Details

Logo image