Logo image
Consistent Depth of Reasoning in Level-k Models
Journal article   Peer reviewed

Consistent Depth of Reasoning in Level-k Models

David Cooper, Enrique Fatas, Antonio Morales and Shi Qi
American economic journal. Microeconomics, Vol.16(4), pp.40-76
11/01/2024
DOI: 10.1257/mic.20210237
url
https://ueaeprints.uea.ac.uk/id/eprint/93018/1/ConsistentDepth_LevelK.pdfView
Open Access

Abstract

Level-k models often assume that individuals employ a fixed depth of reasoning across different games. We study this assumption by having subjects make choices in five classes of games chosen to identify inconsistent depth of reasoning. We demonstrate that depth of reasoning is pervasively inconsistent, changing both within and between classes of games. We show that this cannot easily be explained by factors such as subject confusion, changing beliefs about others' depth of reasoning, stochastic choice, model misspecification, changing incentives, or low cognitive ability. We develop a simple model incorporating ambiguity aversion that predicts inconsistent depth of reasoning.
Spain Belief Criteria for Decision-Making under Risk and Uncertainty (D81) Design of Experiments: General (C90) Econometrics of Games and Auctions (C57) Micro-Based Behavioral Economics: Role and Effects of Psychological, Emotional, Social, and Cognitive Factors on Decision Making (D91) Misspecification Search, Learning, Information and Knowledge, Communication, Belief, Unawareness (D83)

Details

Metrics

Logo image