Logo image
Correction: The persistent lack of knowledge and misunderstanding of the Genetic Information Nondiscrimination Act (GINA) more than a decade after passage
Journal article   Open access   Peer reviewed

Correction: The persistent lack of knowledge and misunderstanding of the Genetic Information Nondiscrimination Act (GINA) more than a decade after passage

Andrea Lenartz, Aaron M Scherer, Wendy R Uhlmann, Sonia M Suter, Colleen Anderson Hartley and Anya E R Prince
Genetics in medicine, Vol.23(12), pp.2471-2471
12/2021
DOI: 10.1038/s41436-021-01305-8
PMID: 34446926
url
https://doi.org/10.1038/s41436-021-01305-8View
Published (Version of record) Open Access

Abstract

Unfortunately the part “Results” in the abstract was given incorrectly. The correct text is given below. RESULTS: Overall, participants had a mean age of 43.1 (SD = 13.9), 51.8% identified as female, 63.1% identified as non-Hispanic White, and 38.4% had ≥4-year college degree. Respondents reported relatively low subjective knowledge of GINA (M = 3.10, SD = 1.98; 7-point Likert scale). Among respondents reporting high subjective knowledge of GINA (16.2%), 92.6% incorrectly reported or did not know that GINA does not cover life, long-term care, and disability insurance, and this number was 82.4% for auto or property insurance. Respondents were relatively likely to decline genetic testing due to concerns about results being used to determine eligibility for employment (M = 4.68, SD = 1.89) or health insurance (M = 4.94, SD = 1.73). There were few consistent demographic associations with either subjective or objective knowledge of GINA. The original article has been corrected.

Details

Metrics

Logo image