Logo image
Cost Comparison of Efanesoctocog Alfa vs Conventional Factor VIII Therapies for Major Surgeries in Severe Hemophilia A
Journal article   Open access   Peer reviewed

Cost Comparison of Efanesoctocog Alfa vs Conventional Factor VIII Therapies for Major Surgeries in Severe Hemophilia A

Janice M. Staber, Alix Arnaud, Ion Agirrezabal, Duygu Bozkaya, Lane Anson, Andrew Wilson, Nana Kragh, Doris Quon and Allison P. Wheeler
Blood Vessels, Thrombosis & Hemostasis, 100166
03/2026
DOI: 10.1016/j.bvth.2026.100166
url
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bvth.2026.100166View
Published (Version of record) Open Access

Abstract

We estimated total costs for perioperative hemostatic management with standard half-life (SHL), extended half-life (EHL) and high-sustained (efanesoctocog alfa) factor VIII (FVIII) products in people with severe hemophilia A. The data on dose, total factor consumption and target FVIII activity for major surgeries were collected from United States (US) prescribing information and phase 3 clinical trials. The differences in the total factor consumption and total costs between therapies were compared. The median total factor consumption per major surgery involving octocog alfa (SHL), rurioctocog alfa pegol (EHL), efmoroctocog alfa (EHL) and efanesoctocog alfa was 910, 629, 493 and 163 IU/Kg, respectively. The total factor costs were $162,308, $147,104, $120,233 and $81,286, respectively. Efanesoctocog alfa resulted in $81,022 to $38,947 savings versus SHL/EHL therapies per surgery. The perioperative management with efanesoctocog alfa was estimated to be markedly more economical than that with SHL and EHL therapies due to its high-sustained factor activity.

Details

Metrics

1 Record Views
Logo image