Logo image
Cutaneous head and neck melanoma in OPTiM, a randomized phase 3 trial of talimogene laherparepvec versus granulocyte-macrophage colony-stimulating factor for the treatment of unresected stage IIIB/IIIC/IV melanoma
Journal article   Open access   Peer reviewed

Cutaneous head and neck melanoma in OPTiM, a randomized phase 3 trial of talimogene laherparepvec versus granulocyte-macrophage colony-stimulating factor for the treatment of unresected stage IIIB/IIIC/IV melanoma

Robert H I Andtbacka, Sanjiv S Agarwala, David W Ollila, Sigrun Hallmeyer, Mohammed Milhem, Thomas Amatruda, John J Nemunaitis, Kevin J Harrington, Lisa Chen, Mark Shilkrut, …
Head & neck, Vol.38(12), pp.1752-1758
12/2016
DOI: 10.1002/hed.24522
PMCID: PMC5129499
PMID: 27407058
url
https://doi.org/10.1002/hed.24522View
Published (Version of record) Open Access

Abstract

Cutaneous head and neck melanoma has poor outcomes and limited treatment options. In OPTiM, a phase 3 study in patients with unresectable stage IIIB/IIIC/IV melanoma, intralesional administration of the oncolytic virus talimogene laherparepvec improved durable response rate (DRR; continuous response ≥6 months) compared with subcutaneous granulocyte-macrophage colony-stimulating factor (GM-CSF). Retrospective review of OPTiM identified patients with cutaneous head and neck melanoma given talimogene laherparepvec (n = 61) or GM-CSF (n = 26). Outcomes were compared between talimogene laherparepvec and GM-CSF treated patients with cutaneous head and neck melanoma. DRR was higher for talimogene laherparepvec-treated patients than for GM-CSF treated patients (36.1% vs 3.8%; p = .001). A total of 29.5% of patients had a complete response with talimogene laherparepvec versus 0% with GM-CSF. Among talimogene laherparepvec-treated patients with a response, the probability of still being in response after 12 months was 73%. Median overall survival (OS) was 25.2 months for GM-CSF and had not been reached with talimogene laherparepvec. Treatment with talimogene laherparepvec was associated with improved response and survival compared with GM-CSF in patients with cutaneous head and neck melanoma. © 2016 Wiley Periodicals, Inc. Head Neck 38: 1752-1758, 2016.
Multivariate Analysis Prognosis Humans Middle Aged Male Granulocyte-Macrophage Colony-Stimulating Factor - therapeutic use Injections, Intralesional Neoplasm Invasiveness - pathology Skin Neoplasms - mortality Adult Female Skin Neoplasms - pathology Skin Neoplasms - therapy Head and Neck Neoplasms - therapy Kaplan-Meier Estimate Proportional Hazards Models Treatment Outcome Melanoma - pathology Head and Neck Neoplasms - pathology Disease-Free Survival Oncolytic Virotherapy - methods Survival Analysis Aged Head and Neck Neoplasms - mortality Melanoma - therapy Neoplasm Staging Melanoma - mortality

Details

Logo image