Journal article
Demystifying responding to peer reviews: turning feedback into success
Journal of the American Pharmacists Association, Vol.65(6), 102925
11/2025
DOI: 10.1016/j.japh.2025.102925
PMID: 40946737
Abstract
The process of responding to peer review comments can sometimes be confusing and emotional. This article aims to provide guidance to authors on how to navigate this aspect of the academic publishing process. It details the peer review process generally, formatting responses, negotiating timelines, leveraging co-authors for assistance, navigating conflicts and disagreements, dealing with unprofessional reviews, and handling manuscript rejections. The authors emphasize the importance of constructive engagement with reviewer feedback, even when challenging, and offer strategies for managing the submission process effectively.
Details
- Title: Subtitle
- Demystifying responding to peer reviews: turning feedback into success
- Creators
- Jordan R. Covvey - Duquesne UniversityJohn Swegle - University of IowaK.Ashley Garling-Nañez - The University of Texas at AustinJeffrey G. HamperSarah E. Vordenberg - Michigan MedicineKimberly M. Kelly - University of Tennessee Health Science Center
- Resource Type
- Journal article
- Publication Details
- Journal of the American Pharmacists Association, Vol.65(6), 102925
- DOI
- 10.1016/j.japh.2025.102925
- PMID
- 40946737
- NLM abbreviation
- J Am Pharm Assoc (2003)
- ISSN
- 1544-3191
- eISSN
- 1544-3450
- Publisher
- ELSEVIER
- Language
- English
- Electronic publication date
- 09/12/2025
- Date published
- 11/2025
- Academic Unit
- Pharmacy Practice and Science
- Record Identifier
- 9984963625402771
Metrics
5 Record Views