Logo image
Detecting paroxysmal coughing from pertussis cases using voice recognition technology
Journal article   Open access   Peer reviewed

Detecting paroxysmal coughing from pertussis cases using voice recognition technology

Danny Parker, Joseph Picone, Amir Harati, Shuang Lu, Marion H Jenkyns and Philip M Polgreen
PloS one, Vol.8(12), pp.e82971-e82971
2013
DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0082971
PMCID: PMC3876998
PMID: 24391730
url
https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0082971View
Published (Version of record) Open Access

Abstract

Pertussis is highly contagious; thus, prompt identification of cases is essential to control outbreaks. Clinicians experienced with the disease can easily identify classic cases, where patients have bursts of rapid coughing followed by gasps, and a characteristic whooping sound. However, many clinicians have never seen a case, and thus may miss initial cases during an outbreak. The purpose of this project was to use voice-recognition software to distinguish pertussis coughs from croup and other coughs. We collected a series of recordings representing pertussis, croup and miscellaneous coughing by children. We manually categorized coughs as either pertussis or non-pertussis, and extracted features for each category. We used Mel-frequency cepstral coefficients (MFCC), a sampling rate of 16 KHz, a frame Duration of 25 msec, and a frame rate of 10 msec. The coughs were filtered. Each cough was divided into 3 sections of proportion 3-4-3. The average of the 13 MFCCs for each section was computed and made into a 39-element feature vector used for the classification. We used the following machine learning algorithms: Neural Networks, K-Nearest Neighbor (KNN), and a 200 tree Random Forest (RF). Data were reserved for cross-validation of the KNN and RF. The Neural Network was trained 100 times, and the averaged results are presented. After categorization, we had 16 examples of non-pertussis coughs and 31 examples of pertussis coughs. Over 90% of all pertussis coughs were properly classified as pertussis. The error rates were: Type I errors of 7%, 12%, and 25% and Type II errors of 8%, 0%, and 0%, using the Neural Network, Random Forest, and KNN, respectively. Our results suggest that we can build a robust classifier to assist clinicians and the public to help identify pertussis cases in children presenting with typical symptoms.
Acoustics Algorithms Artificial Intelligence Child Cough - diagnosis Cough - physiopathology Diagnosis, Computer-Assisted - methods Diagnosis, Differential Humans Neural Networks, Computer Speech Recognition Software Whooping Cough - diagnosis Whooping Cough - physiopathology

Details

Metrics

50 readers on Mendeley
1 readers on CiteULike
Logo image