Logo image
Development and Validation of a Family Meeting Assessment Tool (FMAT)
Journal article   Open access   Peer reviewed

Development and Validation of a Family Meeting Assessment Tool (FMAT)

Yuya Hagiwara, Jennifer Healy, Shuko Lee, Jeanette Ross, Dixie Fischer and Sandra Sanchez-Reilly
Journal of pain and symptom management, Vol.55(1), pp.89-93
01/2018
DOI: 10.1016/j.jpainsymman.2017.07.048
PMID: 28843457
url
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jpainsymman.2017.07.048View
Published (Version of record) Open Access

Abstract

A cornerstone procedure in Palliative Medicine is to perform family meetings. Learning how to lead a family meeting is an important skill for physicians and others who care for patients with serious illnesses and their families. There is limited evidence on how to assess best practice behaviors during end-of-life family meetings. Our aim was to develop and validate an observational tool to assess trainees' ability to lead a simulated end-of-life family meeting. Building on evidence from published studies and accrediting agency guidelines, an expert panel at our institution developed the Family Meeting Assessment Tool. All fourth-year medical students (MS4) and eight geriatric and palliative medicine fellows (GPFs) were invited to participate in a Family Meeting Objective Structured Clinical Examination, where each trainee assumed the physician role leading a complex family meeting. Two evaluators observed and rated randomly chosen students' performances using the Family Meeting Assessment Tool during the examination. Inter-rater reliability was measured using percent agreement. Internal consistency was measured using Cronbach α. A total of 141 trainees (MS4 = 133 and GPF = 8) and 26 interdisciplinary evaluators participated in the study. Internal reliability (Cronbach α) of the tool was 0.85. Number of trainees rated by two evaluators was 210 (MS4 = 202 and GPF = 8). Rater agreement was 84%. Composite scores, on average, were significantly higher for fellows than for medical students (P < 0.001). Expert-based content, high inter-rater reliability, good internal consistency, and ability to predict educational level provided initial evidence for construct validity for this novel assessment tool.
Palliative Care Clinical Competence Reproducibility of Results Physicians Humans Education, Medical Professional-Family Relations Students, Medical Terminal Care Health Communication

Details

Metrics

Logo image