Journal article
Diagnostic strategy and timing of intervention in infected necrotizing pancreatitis: an international expert survey and case vignette study
HPB (Oxford, England), Vol.18(1), pp.49-56
01/01/2016
DOI: 10.1016/j.hpb.2015.07.003
PMID: 26776851
Abstract
The optimal diagnostic strategy and timing of intervention in infected necrotizing pancreatitis is subject to debate. We performed a survey on these topics amongst a group of international expert pancreatologists.
An online survey including case vignettes was sent to 118 international pancreatologists. We evaluated the use and timing of fine needle aspiration (FNA), antibiotics, catheter drainage and (minimally invasive) necrosectomy.
The response rate was 74% (N = 87). None of the respondents use FNA routinely, 85% selectively and 15% never. Most respondents (87%) use a step-up approach in patients with infected necrosis. Walled-off necrosis (WON) is considered a prerequisite for endoscopic drainage and percutaneous drainage by 66% and 12%, respectively. After diagnosing infected necrosis, 55% routinely postpone invasive interventions, whereas 45% proceed immediately to intervention. Lack of consensus about timing of intervention was apparent on day 14 with proven infected necrosis (58% intervention vs. 42% non-invasive) as well as on day 20 with only clinically suspected infected necrosis (59% intervention vs. 41% non-invasive).
The step-up approach is the preferred treatment strategy in infected necrotizing pancreatitis amongst expert pancreatologists. There is no uniformity regarding the use of FNA and timing of intervention in the first 2-3 weeks of infected necrotizing pancreatitis.
Details
- Title: Subtitle
- Diagnostic strategy and timing of intervention in infected necrotizing pancreatitis: an international expert survey and case vignette study
- Creators
- Janneke van Grinsven - Amsterdam UMC Location University of AmsterdamSandra van Brunschot - Amsterdam UMC Location University of AmsterdamOlaf J Bakker - University Medical Center UtrechtThomas L Bollen - St. Antonius ZiekenhuisMarja A Boermeester - Amsterdam UMC Location University of AmsterdamMarco J Bruno - Erasmus MCCornelis H Dejong - Maastricht University Medical CentreMarcel G Dijkgraaf - Amsterdam UMC Location University of AmsterdamCasper H van Eijck - Erasmus MCPaul Fockens - Amsterdam UMC Location University of AmsterdamHarry van Goor - Radboud University NijmegenHein G Gooszen - Radboud University NijmegenKaren D Horvath - University of Washington Medical CenterKrijn P van Lienden - Amsterdam UMC Location University of AmsterdamHjalmar C van Santvoort - Amsterdam UMC Location University of AmsterdamMarc G Besselink - Amsterdam UMC Location University of AmsterdamDutch Pancreatitis Study GroupVikas Dudeja (Contributor) - Surgery
- Resource Type
- Journal article
- Publication Details
- HPB (Oxford, England), Vol.18(1), pp.49-56
- DOI
- 10.1016/j.hpb.2015.07.003
- PMID
- 26776851
- NLM abbreviation
- HPB (Oxford)
- ISSN
- 1365-182X
- eISSN
- 1477-2574
- Grant note
- 15957 / Cancer Research UK 8968 / Cancer Research UK PB-PG-0407-13363 / Department of Health
- Language
- English
- Date published
- 01/01/2016
- Academic Unit
- Anatomy and Cell Biology; Surgery
- Record Identifier
- 9985244578202771
Metrics
1 Record Views