Logo image
Discussion of Average versus Extreme Case Severity in Pandemic Risk Communications
Journal article   Open access   Peer reviewed

Discussion of Average versus Extreme Case Severity in Pandemic Risk Communications

Brian J Zikmund-Fisher, Aaron M Scherer, Megan Knaus, Enny Das and Angela Fagerlin
Emerging infectious diseases, Vol.23(4), pp.706-708
04/2017
DOI: 10.3201/eid2304.161600
PMCID: PMC5367401
PMID: 28322691
url
https://doi.org/10.3201/eid2304.161600View
Published (Version of record) Open Access

Abstract

To investigate determinants of the public's perceptions of disease threat, in 2015 we conducted a randomized survey experiment in the Netherlands. Adults who read a mock news article describing average +or extreme outcomes from a hypothetical influenza pandemic were more influenced by average than by extreme case information. Presenting both types of information simultaneously appeared counterproductive.
Risk Reduction Behavior Humans Middle Aged Influenza, Human - epidemiology Male Pandemics - statistics & numerical data Risk Data Collection Health Knowledge, Attitudes, Practice Young Adult Netherlands Adolescent Aged, 80 and over Mass Media Adult Female Surveys and Questionnaires Aged Disease Transmission, Infectious Communication

Details

Metrics

Logo image