Logo image
Dissociation between reduced pain and arterial blood pressure following epidural spinal cord stimulation in patients with chronic pain: A retrospective study
Journal article   Open access   Peer reviewed

Dissociation between reduced pain and arterial blood pressure following epidural spinal cord stimulation in patients with chronic pain: A retrospective study

Seth W. Holwerda, Marshall T. Holland, Alexander L. Green, Amy C. S. Pearson and Gary L. Pierce
Clinical autonomic research, Vol.31(2), pp.303-316
04/01/2021
DOI: 10.1007/s10286-020-00690-5
PMCID: PMC8456508
PMID: 32323062
url
https://doi.org/10.1007/s10286-020-00690-5View
Published (Version of record) Open Access

Abstract

Purpose Acute pain and resting arterial blood pressure (BP) are positively correlated in patients with chronic pain. However, it remains unclear whether treatment for chronic pain reduces BP. Therefore, in a retrospective study design, we tested the hypothesis that implantation of an epidural spinal cord stimulator (SCS) device to treat chronic pain would significantly reduce clinic pain ratings and BP and that these reductions would be significantly correlated. Methods Pain ratings and BP in medical records were collected before and after surgical implantation of a SCS device at the University of Iowa Hospitals and Clinics between 2008 and 2018 (n = 213). Results Reductions in pain rating [6.3 +/- 2.0 vs. 5.0 +/- 1.9 (scale: 0-10), P < 0.001] and BP [mean arterial pressure (MAP) 95 +/- 10 vs. 89 +/- 10 mmHg, P < 0.001] were statistically significant within 30 days of SCS. Interestingly, BP returned toward baseline within 60 days following SCS implantation. Multiple linear regression analysis showed that sex (P = 0.007), baseline MAP (P < 0.001), and taking hypertension (HTN) medications (P < 0.001) were significant determinants of change in MAP from baseline (Delta MAP) (model R-2 = 0.33). After statistical adjustments, Delta MAP was significantly greater among women than among men ( - 7.2 +/- 8.5 vs. - 3.9 +/- 8.5 mmHg, P = 0.007) and among patients taking HTN medications than among those not taking hypertension medications ( - 10.1 +/- 8.7 vs. - 3.9 +/- 8.5 mmHg, P < 0.001), despite no group differences in change in pain ratings. Conclusions Together, these findings suggest that SCS for chronic pain independently produces clinically meaningful, albeit transient, reductions in BP and may provide a rationale for studies aimed at reducing HTN medication burden among this patient population.
Clinical Neurology Life Sciences & Biomedicine Neurosciences Neurosciences & Neurology Science & Technology

Details

Metrics

Logo image