Logo image
Double slide viewing as a cytology quality improvement initiative
Journal article   Open access   Peer reviewed

Double slide viewing as a cytology quality improvement initiative

Stephen S RAAB, Chad H STONE, Chris S JENSEN, Richard J ZARBO, Frederick A MEIER, Dana M GRZYBICKI, Colleen M VRBIN, N. Paul OHORI and Laila DAHMOUSH
American journal of clinical pathology, Vol.125(4), pp.526-533
2006
DOI: 10.1309/TKNM-9GRG-PL2J-T95Y
PMID: 16627263
url
https://doi.org/10.1309/TKNM-9GRG-PL2J-T95YView
Published (Version of record) Open Access

Abstract

Few studies have measured the effect of pre-sign out double viewing of cytology cases as a means to decrease error. Three Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality-funded project sites performed pre-sign out double viewing of 431 pulmonary cytology cases. Two-step or more differences in diagnosis were arbitrated as interpretive errors, and the effect of double viewing was measured by comparing the frequency of cytologic-histologic correlation-detected errors in the previous 2 years with the double-viewing period. The number of interpretive errors detected by double viewing for the 3 institutions was 2.7%, 0% and 1.9%, respectively. Double viewing did not lower the frequency of cytologic-histologic correlation false-negative errors. We conclude that double viewing detects errors in up to 1 of every 37 cases and that biases in the double-viewing process limit error detection.
Biological and medical sciences Investigative techniques, diagnostic techniques (general aspects) Medical sciences Pathology. Cytology. Biochemistry. Spectrometry. Miscellaneous investigative techniques

Details

Metrics

Logo image