Journal article
Economics and Elections Revisited
Comparative political studies, Vol.46(5), pp.551-573
05/2013
DOI: 10.1177/0010414012463877
Abstract
The economics and elections connection has been heavily investigated, although mostly through single-country studies. The first comparative, survey-based research on economic voting, by Lewis–Beck, found serious effects. Subsequently, other comparative scholars have explored this terrain. The most recent, and most ambitious, examinations are by Duch and Stevenson and by van der Brug et al. These impressive efforts arrive at opposing conclusions about the importance of economic voting. We carry out another major examination, with an eye to reconciling these differences. A carefully specified model of vote choice is estimated on a balanced survey pool (N > 40,000) from 10 Western European nations. Special pains are taken with issues of economic measurement, estimation, and endogeneity. The finding is that economic perceptions are formed from economic reality, and importantly influence vote choice. Besides enhancing our understanding of comparative political behavior, the strong result speaks to the functioning of government accountability in advanced democracies.
Details
- Title: Subtitle
- Economics and Elections Revisited
- Creators
- Richard Nadeau - University of Montreal, Montreal, Quebec, CanadaMichael S Lewis-Beck - University of Iowa, Iowa City, IA, USAÉric Bélanger - McGill University, Montreal, Quebec, Canada
- Resource Type
- Journal article
- Publication Details
- Comparative political studies, Vol.46(5), pp.551-573
- DOI
- 10.1177/0010414012463877
- ISSN
- 0010-4140
- eISSN
- 1552-3829
- Language
- English
- Date published
- 05/2013
- Academic Unit
- Political Science
- Record Identifier
- 9984025657002771
Metrics
14 Record Views