Journal article
Editor's Note
Dance research journal, Vol.55(3), pp.1-4
12/01/2023
DOI: 10.1017/S0149767724000020
Abstract
Sean Mulcahy's and Kate Seear's research is situated within the Australian legal context of human rights scrutiny, a process that substitutes for a “national bill or charter of human rights,” and is modeled after a similar parliamentary process in the United Kingdom (47). In their article, “A ‘Tick and Flick’ Exercise: Movement and Form in Australian Parliamentary Human Rights Scrutiny,” they investigate how dance, specifically choreographic practices, can shed light on international human rights law, which “recognizes the right to liberty of movement, often conceived of as a right to move freely” (47). Mulcahy's and Seear's research draws on data they generated from 30 interviews with individuals involved in Australian legal systems that adjudicate over human rights. According to Alvarez San Román, the fact that the name survived for so long within music hall circles could lead only to one explanation: that it had been adopted by many.
Details
- Title: Subtitle
- Editor's Note
- Creators
- Rebekah Kowal
- Resource Type
- Journal article
- Publication Details
- Dance research journal, Vol.55(3), pp.1-4
- Publisher
- Congress on Research in Dance
- DOI
- 10.1017/S0149767724000020
- ISSN
- 0149-7677
- eISSN
- 1940-509X
- Language
- English
- Date published
- 12/01/2023
- Academic Unit
- Dance
- Record Identifier
- 9984624560302771
Metrics
1 Record Views