Logo image
Effect of Introducing Hematoma Ultrasound-Guided Lumpectomy in a Surgical Practice
Journal article

Effect of Introducing Hematoma Ultrasound-Guided Lumpectomy in a Surgical Practice

Gregory Larrieux, Julie A. Cupp, Junlin Liao, Carol E. H. Scott-Conner and Ronald J. Weigel
Journal of the American College of Surgeons, Vol.215(2), pp.237-243
08/01/2012
DOI: 10.1016/j.jamcollsurg.2012.04.018
PMCID: PMC4437196
PMID: 22632911
url
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/4437196View
Open Access

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Preoperative needle localization (NL) is the gold standard for lumpectomy of nonpalpable breast cancer. Hematoma ultrasound-guided (HUG) lumpectomy can offer several advantages. The purpose of this study was to compare the use of HUG with NL lumpectomy in a single surgical practice. STUDY DESIGN: Patients with nonpalpable lesions who underwent NL or HUG lumpectomy from January 2007 to December 2009 by a single surgeon were identified from a breast surgery database. Ease of scheduling, volume excised, re-excision rates, operating room time, and health care charges were the main outcomes variables. Univariate and multivariate analyses were performed to compare the 2 groups. RESULTS: Lumpectomy was performed in 110 patients, 55 underwent HUG and 55 underwent NL. Hematoma ultrasound-guided lumpectomy was associated with a nearly 3-fold increase in the odds ratio of additional tissue being submitted to pathology (p = 0.039), but neither the total amount of breast tissue removed, nor the need for second procedure were statistically different between the 2 groups. Duration of the surgical procedure did not vary between the 2 groups; however, the time from biopsy to surgery was shorter for HUG by an expected 9.7 days (p = 0.019), implying greater ease of scheduling. Mean charges averaged $250 less for HUG than for NL, but this difference was not statistically significant. CONCLUSIONS: Hematoma ultrasound-guided is equivalent to NL with regard to volume of tissue excised, need for operative re-excision, and operating room time. Adoption of HUG in our practice allowed for more timely surgical care. (J Am Coll Surg 2012; 215: 237-243. (C) 2012 by the American College of Surgeons)
Life Sciences & Biomedicine Science & Technology Surgery

Details

Metrics

Logo image