Effect of a non-reactive absorbent with or without environmentally oriented electronic feedback on anesthesia provider's fresh gas flow rates: A greening initiative

Carlos E Guerra-Londono; Franklin Dexter; John D Mitchell; Patrick B Forrest; Donald H Penning

doi:10.1016/j.jclinane.2024.111441

Back

Journal article

Open access

Peer reviewed

Effect of a non-reactive absorbent with or without environmentally oriented electronic feedback on anesthesia provider's fresh gas flow rates: A greening initiative

Carlos E Guerra-Londono, Franklin Dexter, John D Mitchell, Patrick B Forrest and Donald H Penning

Journal of clinical anesthesia, Vol.95, 111441

08/2024

DOI: 10.1016/j.jclinane.2024.111441

PMID: 38452428

Files and links (1)

url

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclinane.2024.111441View

Published (Version of record) Open Access

Abstract

To examine the effects of a non-reactive carbon dioxide absorbent (AMSORB® Plus) versus a traditional carbon dioxide absorbent (Medisorb™) on the FGF used by anesthesia providers and an electronic educational feedback intervention using Carestation™ Insights (GE HealthCare) on provider-specific change in FGF. Prospective, single-center cohort study set in a greening initiative. Operating room. 157 anesthesia providers (i.e., anesthesiology trainees, certified registered nurse anesthetists, and solo anesthesiologists). Intervention #1 was the introduction of AMSORB® Plus into 8 Aisys CS2, Carestation™ Insights-enabled anesthesia machines (GE HealthCare) at the study site. At the end of week 6, anesthesia providers were educated and given an environmentally oriented electronic feedback strategy for the next 12 weeks of the study (Intervention #2) using Carestation™ Insights data. The dual primary outcomes were the difference in average daily FGF during maintenance anesthesia between machines assigned to AMSORB® Plus versus Medisorb™ and the provider-specific change in average fresh gas flows after 12 weeks of feedback and education compared to the historical data. Over the 18-week period, there were 1577 inhaled anesthetics performed in the 8 operating rooms (528 for intervention 1, 1049 for intervention 2). There were 1001 provider days using Aisys CS2 machines and 7452 provider days of historical data from the preceding year. Overall, AMSORB® Plus was not associated with significantly less FGF (mean - 80 ml/min, 97.5% confidence interval - 206 to 46, P = .15). The environmentally oriented electronic feedback intervention was not associated with a significant decrease in provider-specific mean FGF (-112 ml/min, 97.5% confidence interval - 244 to 21, P = .059). This study showed that introducing a non-reactive absorbent did not significantly alter FGF. Using environmentally oriented electronic feedback relying on data analytics did not result in significantly reduced provider-specific FGF.

Inhalation anesthesia

Quality improvement

Feedback

Amsorb

Data analytics

Carbon footprint

Details

Title: Subtitle: Effect of a non-reactive absorbent with or without environmentally oriented electronic feedback on anesthesia provider's fresh gas flow rates: A greening initiative
Creators: Carlos E Guerra-Londono - Henry Ford Health System
Franklin Dexter - University of Iowa
John D Mitchell - Henry Ford Health System
Patrick B Forrest - Henry Ford Health System
Donald H Penning - Henry Ford Health System
Resource Type: Journal article
Publication Details: Journal of clinical anesthesia, Vol.95, 111441
DOI: 10.1016/j.jclinane.2024.111441
PMID: 38452428
NLM abbreviation: J Clin Anesth
eISSN: 1873-4529
Publisher: Elsevier
Grant note: DOI: 10.13039/100013331, name: American Society of Anesthesiologists; DOI: 10.13039/100006775, name: GE Healthcare, award: E23034
Language: English
Electronic publication date: 03/06/2024
Date published: 08/2024
Academic Unit: Anesthesia
Record Identifier: 9984567869302771

Metrics

54 Record Views

2 Times Cited - Web of Science