Logo image
Effect of different adhesive strategies and storage time on bond strength of bi-functional monomers to simulated endodontically-treated dentin
Journal article   Open access   Peer reviewed

Effect of different adhesive strategies and storage time on bond strength of bi-functional monomers to simulated endodontically-treated dentin

Aline Carvalho Girotto, Gabriel Abuna, Cristian Sanchez-Puetate, Mayra Andressa Piccioni, Thiago Soares Porto and Milton Carlos Kuga
Dental materials journal, Vol.40(6), pp.1410-1417
2021
DOI: 10.4012/dmj.2021-074
PMID: 34321370
url
https://doi.org/10.4012/dmj.2021-074View
Published (Version of record) Open Access

Abstract

Adhesive strategies were evaluated on the bond strength of bi-functional monomers bonded to endodontically-treated-dentin (ETD). Superficial dentin was removed on human molars. Teeth were immersed in 5 mL 2.5% NaOCl, followed by immersion in 5 mL 17% EDTA. Dentin surface impregnated with epoxy resin-based sealer was then divided four groups (n=10): Scotchbond Multi-Purpose (SBMP); Single Bond Universal (SBU); Optibond All-in-One (OPB); and Tetric-N-Bond Universal (TBU). After 24-h or 1-year-of-storage specimens were submitted to microtensile bond strength (µTBS) and failure classification. A confocal laser scanning microscope (CLSM) evaluated the hybrid layer formation. Two-way ANOVA and Tukey-HSD test were performed (α=5%). The µTBS did not present statistical differences among adhesive strategies after 24-h. Significant differences were found after 1-year-of-storage. CLSM analysis showed water infiltration and consequently degradation of the hybrid layer after 1-year-of-storage. The use of SBU universal adhesive on the self-etching mode on ETD produced more stable bond over the 1-year-of-storage.
Materials Testing Composite Resins Dental Bonding Dental Cements Dentin Dentin-Bonding Agents Humans Resin Cements Tensile Strength

Details

Metrics

Logo image