Journal article
Endoscopic Ultrasound-Guided Versus Transjugular Portal Pressure Measurements: Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis
Digestive diseases and sciences
06/05/2026
DOI: 10.1007/s10620-026-10042-4
PMID: 42249245
Abstract
Published reviews of endoscopic ultrasound-guided portal pressure gradient (EUS-PPG) have emphasized feasibility and safety. We performed a systematic review and meta-analysis specifically to evaluate how closely EUS-based portal pressure measurements track invasive comparator measurements in prospective paired studies and to summarize agreement, technical success, and adverse events.
We searched major databases through January 2026 for prospective cohorts reporting same-patient EUS-based portal pressure measurement and invasive hemodynamic measurements. Correlations were pooled with random-effects models and analyzed separately for studies comparing EUS-PPG with hepatic venous pressure gradient (HVPG) and studies comparing EUS-based portal measurements with direct portal venous pressure. Agreement and threshold discordance were summarized descriptively.
Six prospective cohorts (127 attempted procedures) were included. In studies using HVPG as the comparator, the pooled correlation was 0.82 (95% CI, 0.72-0.89; I
= 0%). In studies comparing EUS-based portal measurements with direct portal venous pressure, the pooled correlation was 0.86 (95% CI, 0.72-0.93; I
= 16.9%). Technical success was 95.3%. EUS-PPG-attributed adverse events occurred in 2.4% of procedures, with no procedure-related deaths. Agreement data were limited. Reported limits of agreement were wide (approximately - 6 to + 7 mmHg), and discrepancies of 5 mmHg or greater occurred in 4 of 30 paired measurements.
EUS-based portal pressure measurement is feasible and shows a strong association with invasive hemodynamic comparators, but the evidence base remains small (six cohorts, 127 attempted procedures). Further study will be necessary to establish patient-level agreement, procedural reproducibility, EUS-specific clinically significant portal hypertension thresholds, and whether HVPG-based decision thresholds can be transferred to EUS-derived measurements.
Details
- Title: Subtitle
- Endoscopic Ultrasound-Guided Versus Transjugular Portal Pressure Measurements: Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis
- Creators
- Rintaro Hashimoto - University of Iowa Health CareTomohiro Tanaka - University of IowaKenneth J Chang - Hoag Memorial Hospital Presbyterian
- Resource Type
- Journal article
- Publication Details
- Digestive diseases and sciences
- DOI
- 10.1007/s10620-026-10042-4
- PMID
- 42249245
- NLM abbreviation
- Dig Dis Sci
- ISSN
- 1573-2568
- eISSN
- 1573-2568
- Publisher
- Springer Nature
- Language
- English
- Electronic publication date
- 06/05/2026
- Academic Unit
- Health Management and Policy; Gastroenterology and Hepatology; Internal Medicine
- Record Identifier
- 9985174710202771
Metrics
1 Record Views