Journal article
Enhanced Motivation and Decision Making from Going Hybrid
Small group research, Vol.53(3), pp.427-463
06/01/2022
DOI: 10.1177/10464964211043565
Abstract
Hybrid brainstorming is ecologically more valid than all-interactive or all-noninteractive brainstorming, yet understudied. Although ideational benefits of hybrid groups have been found, studies have rarely focused on its affective/motivational contributions or ability to select ideas. In a randomized experiment, noninteractive-then-interactive (hybrid) groups perceived (1) higher goal clarity, engagement, and task attractiveness, and (2) chose more quality ideas than all-noninteractive groups. Additionally, (3) given the instruction for both hybrid and all-noninteractive conditions to be critical in idea selection, participants individually selected ideas that were more useful, thus overall higher quality, than the nonselected.
Details
- Title: Subtitle
- Enhanced Motivation and Decision Making from Going Hybrid
- Creators
- Paul Hangsan Ahn - University of Wisconsin–MadisonLyn M. van Swol - University of Wisconsin–MadisonSang Jung Kim - Univ Wisconsin, 821 Univ Ave, Madison, WI 53706 USAHyelin Park - University of Wisconsin–Madison
- Resource Type
- Journal article
- Publication Details
- Small group research, Vol.53(3), pp.427-463
- Publisher
- Sage
- DOI
- 10.1177/10464964211043565
- ISSN
- 1046-4964
- eISSN
- 1552-8278
- Number of pages
- 37
- Language
- English
- Date published
- 06/01/2022
- Academic Unit
- School of Journalism and Mass Communication; Center for Social Science Innovation
- Record Identifier
- 9984460327302771
Metrics
2 Record Views