Journal article
Evaluation of 14 nonlinear deformation algorithms applied to human brain MRI registration
NeuroImage (Orlando, Fla.), Vol.46(3), pp.786-802
07/01/2009
DOI: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2008.12.037
PMCID: PMC2747506
PMID: 19195496
Abstract
All fields of neuroscience that employ brain imaging need to communicate their results with reference to anatomical regions. In particular, comparative morphometry and group analysis of functional and physiological data require coregistration of brains to establish correspondences across brain structures. It is well established that linear registration of one brain to another is inadequate for aligning brain structures, so numerous algorithms have emerged to nonlinearly register brains to one another. This study is the largest evaluation of nonlinear deformation algorithms applied to brain image registration ever conducted. Fourteen algorithms from laboratories around the world are evaluated using 8 different error measures. More than 45,000 registrations between 80 manually labeled brains were performed by algorithms including: AIR, ANIMAL, ART, Diffeomorphic Demons, FNIRT, IRTK, JRD-fluid, ROMEO, SICLE, SyN, and four different SPM5 algorithms ("SPM2-type" and regular Normalization, Unified Segmentation, and the DARTEL Toolbox). All of these registrations were preceded by linear registration between the same image pairs using FLIRT. One of the most significant findings of this study is that the relative performances of the registration methods under comparison appear to be little affected by the choice of subject population, labeling protocol, and type of overlap measure. This is important because it suggests that the findings are generalizable to new subject populations that are labeled or evaluated using different labeling protocols. Furthermore, we ranked the 14 methods according to three completely independent analyses (permutation tests, one-way ANOVA tests, and indifference-zone ranking) and derived three almost identical top rankings of the methods. ART, SyN, IRTK, and SPM's DARTEL Toolbox gave the best results according to overlap and distance measures, with ART and SyN delivering the most consistently high accuracy across subjects and label sets. Updates will be published on the www.mindboggle.info/papers/ website.
Details
- Title: Subtitle
- Evaluation of 14 nonlinear deformation algorithms applied to human brain MRI registration
- Creators
- Arno Klein - New York State Psychiatric InstituteJesper Andersson - Department of Clinical Neurology [Oxford]Babak Ardekani - Nathan S. Kline Institute for Psychiatric ResearchJohn Ashburner - Functional Imaging LaboratoryBrian Avants - Penn Image Computing & Science Lab [Philadelphia]Ming-Chang Chiang - Laboratory of Neuro Imaging [Los Angeles]Gary Christensen - Department of Electrical and Computer Engineering [Iowa]D. Louis Collins - McConnell Brain Imaging CenterPierre Hellier - Vision, Action et Gestion d'informations en SantéJoo Hyun Song - Department of Electrical and Computer Engineering [Iowa]Mark Jenkinson - Department of Clinical Neurology [Oxford]Claude Lepage - McConnell Brain Imaging CenterDaniel Rueckert - Visual Information ProcessingPaul Thompson - Laboratory of Neuro Imaging [Los Angeles]Tom Vercauteren - Mauna Kea TechnologiesRoger Woods - Department of Neurology [UCLA]John Mann - New York State Psychiatric InstituteRamin Parsey - New York State Psychiatric Institute
- Resource Type
- Journal article
- Publication Details
- NeuroImage (Orlando, Fla.), Vol.46(3), pp.786-802
- DOI
- 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2008.12.037
- PMID
- 19195496
- PMCID
- PMC2747506
- NLM abbreviation
- Neuroimage
- ISSN
- 1053-8119
- eISSN
- 1095-9572
- Publisher
- Elsevier
- Language
- English
- Date published
- 07/01/2009
- Academic Unit
- Electrical and Computer Engineering; Radiation Oncology; Radiation Research Laboratory
- Record Identifier
- 9984047640702771
Metrics
14 Record Views