Logo image
Back
Evaluation of Pain Catastrophizing Scale for surgical referral to pain psychology in patients undergoing spinal surgery
Journal article   Open access   Peer reviewed

Evaluation of Pain Catastrophizing Scale for surgical referral to pain psychology in patients undergoing spinal surgery

Shray Kumar, Katelyn T. Koschmeder, Alex R. Coffman, Natalie A. Glass, Valerie J. Keffala, Cassim M. Igram, Andrew J. Pugely and Catherine R. Olinger
North American Spine Society journal (NASSJ), Vol.19, 100330
09/01/2024
DOI: 10.1016/j.xnsj.2024.100330
PMCID: PMC11254176
PMID: 39021894
url
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.xnsj.2024.100330View
Published (Version of record) Open Access

Abstract

Background: Chronic pain is an issue that affects over 100 million Americans daily. Acceptance and Commitment Therapy (ACT) has been found to be beneficial for patients with chronic pain by focusing provider efforts on teaching coping mechanisms for pain instead of eliminating the pain entirely. Current studies demonstrate that ACT significantly improves post-operative chronic pain scores and outcomes. Methods: The 200 patients chosen via random generator were collected and presented to (institution) orthopedic spine surgeons along with additional information such as the patients' history of present illness, Visual Analog Scale (VAS) scores, PROMIS-CAT Pain Interference scores, and status of opiate usage. Surgeons were blinded to the PCS cutoff scores. The (institution) orthopedic spine surgeons then identified which patients they would indicate for ACT and their reasoning. Pre-determined PCS score cut-offs were separately used to determine if a patient was indicated for ACT. Results: The effectiveness of this screening tool was based on the frequency at which the surgeons and PCS scores were complimentary. A department epidemiologist assisted in the analysis of the data with the use of a ROC curve. ROC Curve demonstrated an area under the curve of 0.7784 with a Sensitivity of 0.68 and a Specificity of 0.79. The cut point according to Youden's index is 35. The data showed that the PCS is moderately accurate in its ability to distinguish coinciding patients that the [institution] orthopedic spine surgeons referred for ACT. The adjusted cut-point indicates that patients above a PCS of 35 would be referred to ACT by the orthopedic spine surgeons while those below a PCS score of 35 would not be referred. Conclusions: Using the PCS, a referral with the department pain psychologist would occur by [institution] orthopedic spinal surgeons for patients that are deemed at-risk with a score of at least 35. The goal following this study is to perform future investigations regarding PCS and ACT with patients regarding chronic opioid use and postoperative outcomes. Patients who would be referred for help with chronic pain would be compared to PCS-referred patients and non-referred patients. Pre-operative ACT would be compared to patient outcomes postoperatively. The future aim is to use the cut-offs established in this study for experimental design to evaluate if PCS-referred patients have better pain management post-operatively as compared to the control and previously referred patients. Level of Evidence: Level III diagnostic study.

Details

Metrics

1 Record Views
4 Times Cited - Web of Science
Logo image