Journal article
Evaluation of Public Participation: The Practices of Certified Planners
Journal of planning education and research, Vol.28(3), pp.293-309
03/2009
DOI: 10.1177/0739456X08326532
Abstract
Public participation has become a central element of planning activity over the last decades. The planning literature has given considerable attention to participation in theory and practice, discussing its benefits for democratic governance, its multiple goals and criteria for assessing success. Although planning academics and practitioners understand the importance of participation and know that participatory processes often fail, the field of participation evaluation lags behind. This paper explores how often, why and how planners evaluate participation in practice. It builds on data collected through a nationally representative survey of 761 AICP-certified planners. We find that they rarely evaluate participation formally. Informal evaluations rely on a wide range of criteria about participation processes and outcomes consistent with the criteria identified by planning theory. The paper presents these evaluation criteria and the practices and recommendation of the planners with most experience in participation evaluation.
Details
- Title: Subtitle
- Evaluation of Public Participation: The Practices of Certified Planners
- Creators
- Lucie Laurian - University of IowaMary Margaret Shaw - URS Corporation
- Resource Type
- Journal article
- Publication Details
- Journal of planning education and research, Vol.28(3), pp.293-309
- DOI
- 10.1177/0739456X08326532
- ISSN
- 0739-456X
- eISSN
- 1552-6577
- Language
- English
- Date published
- 03/2009
- Academic Unit
- School of Planning and Public Affairs; Public Policy Center (Archive)
- Record Identifier
- 9984270198702771
Metrics
9 Record Views