Journal article
Evaluation of five different cochlear implant designs: Audiologic assessment and predictors of performance
The Laryngoscope, Vol.98(10), pp.1100-1106
10/1988
DOI: 10.1288/00005537-198810000-00013
PMID: 3172957
Abstract
The audiologic performance of 54 postlingually deafened adults wearing cochlear implants was uniformly evaluated. The participants had 9 months' or more experience with one of five different cochlear prostheses (Los Angeles Single Channel (N = 11), Vienna Single Channel (N = 4), Melbourne Multichannel (N = 18), Utah Multichannel (N = 19), San Francisco Multichannel (N = 2). The multichannel designs enabled participants to recognize more environmental sounds, provided more speech reading enhancement, and enabled most users to understand limited speech in the sound‐only condition, compared to the single‐channel implant group.
Details
- Title: Subtitle
- Evaluation of five different cochlear implant designs: Audiologic assessment and predictors of performance
- Creators
- Richard S TylerPaul AbbasNancy Tye‐MurrayBruce J GantzJohn F KnutsonBrian F MccabeCharissa LansingCarolyn BrownGeorge WoodworthJames HinrichsFrancis Kuk
- Resource Type
- Journal article
- Publication Details
- The Laryngoscope, Vol.98(10), pp.1100-1106
- DOI
- 10.1288/00005537-198810000-00013
- PMID
- 3172957
- NLM abbreviation
- Laryngoscope
- ISSN
- 0023-852X
- eISSN
- 1531-4995
- Publisher
- John Wiley & Sons, Inc; Hoboken, NJ
- Number of pages
- 7
- Grant note
- General Clinical Research Centers Program (#NS20466‐02 and #RR59)
- Language
- English
- Date published
- 10/1988
- Academic Unit
- Statistics and Actuarial Science; Communication Sciences and Disorders; Psychological and Brain Sciences; Biostatistics; Neurosurgery; Otolaryngology
- Record Identifier
- 9984002444702771
Metrics
27 Record Views