Logo image
Evaluation of the sensitivity and use of the nursing outcomes classification
Journal article   Peer reviewed

Evaluation of the sensitivity and use of the nursing outcomes classification

Marion Johnson, Sue Moorhead, Meridean Maas and David Reed
Journal of nursing measurement, Vol.11(2), pp.119-134
01/01/2003
DOI: 10.1891/1061-3749.11.2.119
PMID: 15274521

View Online

Abstract

The two purposes of the study were evaluation of the sensitivity of Nursing Outcomes Classification (NOC) outcomes to change in patient condition and description of the outcomes and interventions nurses select for patients with a specific nursing diagnosis. Data were collected in 10 clinical sites representing the care continuum. Sensitivity was evaluated by comparing paired serial ratings of the means of NOC outcomes at baseline and subsequent intervals, including discharge. Descriptive statistics were used to illustrate linkages between the outcomes and interventions selected for each diagnosis. There were 4,233 paired serial ratings on 166 NOC outcomes of which 804 included at least two follow-up ratings. The average change ranged from 0.00 to 1.47 on a 5-point scale. The 10 most frequently selected diagnoses varied across sites, as did outcomes and interventions selected for each diagnosis. The findings provide evidence of the sensitivity of NOC in the aggregate and the value of standardized terminology for studying nursing practice.

Nursing North America Adult Humans Nursing Assessment/classification/standards Nursing Diagnosis/classification Nursing Evaluation Research/methods Outcome Assessment (Health Care)/classification/methods Reference Standards Sensitivity and Specificity Terminology as Topic Vocabulary Controlled NOC

Details

Metrics

32 Record Views
Logo image