Journal article
Evidence of the construct validity of developmental ratings of managerial performance
Journal of applied psychology, Vol.88(1), pp.50-66
02/01/2003
DOI: 10.1037/0021-9010.88.1.50
PMID: 12675394
Abstract
The construct validity of developmental ratings of managerial performance was assessed by using 2 data sets, each based on a different 360 degrees rating instrument. Specifically, the authors investigated the nature of the constructs measured by developmental ratings, the structural relationships among those constructs, and the generalizability of results across 4 rater perspectives (boss, peer, subordinate, and self). A structure with 4 lower order factors (Technical Skills, Administrative Skills, Human Skills, and Citizenship Behaviors) and 2 higher order factors (Task Performance and Contextual Performance) was tested against competing models. Results consistently supported the lower order constructs, but the higher order structure was problematic, indicating that the structure of ratings is not yet well understood. Multisample analyses indicated few practically significant differences in factor structures across perspectives.
Details
- Title: Subtitle
- Evidence of the construct validity of developmental ratings of managerial performance
- Creators
- Steven E Scullen - North Carolina State UniversityMichael K Mount - University of IowaTimothy A Judge
- Resource Type
- Journal article
- Publication Details
- Journal of applied psychology, Vol.88(1), pp.50-66
- DOI
- 10.1037/0021-9010.88.1.50
- PMID
- 12675394
- NLM abbreviation
- J Appl Psychol
- ISSN
- 0021-9010
- eISSN
- 1939-1854
- Language
- English
- Date published
- 02/01/2003
- Academic Unit
- Management and Entrepreneurship
- Record Identifier
- 9984963208702771
Metrics
4 Record Views