Logo image
Fast dose optimization for rotating shield brachytherapy
Journal article   Open access   Peer reviewed

Fast dose optimization for rotating shield brachytherapy

Myung Cho, Xiaodong Wu, Hossein Dadkhah, Jirong Yi, Ryan T Flynn, Yusung Kim and Weiyu Xu
Medical physics (Lancaster), Vol.44(10), pp.5384-5392
10/2017
DOI: 10.1002/mp.12486
PMCID: PMC5943050
PMID: 28744870
url
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5943050View
Published (Version of record) Open Access

Abstract

To provide a fast computational method, based on the proximal graph solver (POGS) - A convex optimization solver using the alternating direction method of multipliers (ADMM), for calculating an optimal treatment plan in rotating shield brachytherapy (RSBT). RSBT treatment planning has more degrees of freedom than conventional high-dose-rate brachytherapy due to the addition of emission direction, and this necessitates a fast optimization technique to enable clinical usage. The multi-helix RSBT (H-RSBT) delivery technique was investigated for five representative cervical cancer patients. Treatment plans were generated for all patients using the POGS method and the commercially available solver IBM ILOG CPLEX. The rectum, bladder, sigmoid colon, high-risk clinical target volume (HR-CTV), and HR-CTV boundary were the structures included in our optimization, which applied an asymmetric dose-volume optimization with smoothness control. Dose calculation resolution was 1 × 1 × 3 mm for all cases. The H-RSBT applicator had 6 helices, with 33.3 mm of translation along the applicator per helical rotation and 1.7 mm spacing between dwell positions, yielding 17.5° emission angle spacing per 5 mm along the applicator. For each patient, HR-CTV D , HR-CTV D , rectum D , sigmoid D , and bladder D matched within 1% for CPLEX and POGS methods. Also, similar EQD2 values between CPLEX and POGS methods were obtained. POGS was around 18 times faster than CPLEX. For all patients, total optimization times were 32.1-65.4 s for CPLEX and 2.1-3.9 s for POGS. POGS reduced treatment plan optimization time approximately 18 times for RSBT with similar HR-CTV D , organ at risk (OAR) D values, and EQD2 values compared to CPLEX, which is significant progress toward clinical translation of RSBT.
Radiotherapy Dosage Time Factors Radiotherapy Planning, Computer-Assisted - methods Humans Neoplasms - radiotherapy Brachytherapy Radiation Dosage Rotation

Details

Metrics

Logo image