Logo image
Feasibility and fidelity in applying media advocacy principles as an implementation strategy: lessons from the National ROPS Rebate Program expansion
Journal article   Open access   Peer reviewed

Feasibility and fidelity in applying media advocacy principles as an implementation strategy: lessons from the National ROPS Rebate Program expansion

Pamela J Milkovich, Andrew Johnson, Aaron Yoder, Willard Downes, Karen Funkenbusch, Tawnie Larson, Ed Brokesh, Brandi Janssen, Jackie Curnick and Julie A Sorensen
BMC public health, Vol.25(1), 2407
07/08/2025
DOI: 10.1186/s12889-025-23642-y
PMCID: PMC12235783
PMID: 40629313
url
https://doi.org/10.1186/s12889-025-23642-yView
Published (Version of record) Open Access

Abstract

To increase tension for change and encourage adoption of policies supporting health and safety practice, media advocacy employs a grassroots approach to raising awareness of issues. Allies and authentic voices are strategically engaged to share messages about social issues and the policies that can remedy them. Given its success in other areas of public health, this study aims to trial media advocacy as a method of implementing ROPS Rebate Programs in three states with high rates of tractor overturn fatalities. This manuscript focuses on a process evaluation of the media advocacy campaign. This study ultimately demonstrates low fidelity to the principles of media advocacy due to the context within which the study was attempted. Despite these results, this study provides a clearer picture of the contextual issues states face in attempting to adopt and implement agricultural safety and health programs, such as the National ROPS Rebate Program.
Agriculture Feasibility Studies Mass Media United States Accidents, Occupational - prevention & control Consumer Advocacy Humans

Details

Metrics

2 Record Views
Logo image