Journal article
Finite Element Analysis and Biomechanical Comparison of Short Posterior Spinal Instrumentation with Divergent Bridge Construct versus Parallel Tension Band Construct for Thoracolumbar Spine Fractures
Global spine journal, Vol.3(2), pp.85-94
06/2013
DOI: 10.1055/s-0033-1343073
PMCID: PMC3854578
PMID: 24436856
Abstract
The ideal treatment for unstable thoracolumbar fractures remains controversial with posterior reduction and stabilization, anterior reduction and stabilization, combined posterior and anterior reduction and stabilization, and even nonoperative management advocated. Short segment posterior osteosynthesis of these fractures has less comorbidities compared with the other operative approaches but settles into kyphosis over time. Biomechanical comparison of the divergent bridge construct versus the parallel tension band construct was performed for anteriorly destabilized T11–L1 spine segments using three different models: (1) finite element analysis (FEA), (2) a synthetic model, and (3) a human cadaveric model. Outcomes measured were construct stiffness and ultimate failure load. Our objective was to determine if the divergent pedicle screw bridge construct would provide more resistance to kyphotic deforming forces. All three modalities showed greater stiffness with the divergent bridge construct. The FEA calculated a stiffness of 21.6 N/m for the tension band construct versus 34.1 N/m for the divergent bridge construct. The synthetic model resulted in a mean stiffness of 17.3 N/m for parallel tension band versus 20.6 N/m for the divergent bridge (
p
= 0.03), whereas the cadaveric model had an average stiffness of 15.2 N/m in the parallel tension band compared with 18.4 N/m for the divergent bridge (
p
= 0.02). Ultimate failure load with the cadaveric model was found to be 622 N for the divergent bridge construct versus 419 N (
p
= 0.15) for the parallel tension band construct. This study confirms our clinical experience that the short posterior divergent bridge construct provides greater stiffness for the management of unstable thoracolumbar fractures.
Details
- Title: Subtitle
- Finite Element Analysis and Biomechanical Comparison of Short Posterior Spinal Instrumentation with Divergent Bridge Construct versus Parallel Tension Band Construct for Thoracolumbar Spine Fractures
- Creators
- Jean A Ouellet - McGill Scoliosis and Spine Centre, McGill University Health Centre, Montreal, CanadaCorey Richards - McGill Scoliosis and Spine Centre, McGill University Health Centre, Montreal, CanadaZeeshan M Sardar - McGill Scoliosis and Spine Centre, McGill University Health Centre, Montreal, CanadaDemetri Giannitsios - Orthopaedic Research Lab, McGill University Health Centre, Montreal, CanadaNicholas Noiseux - McGill Scoliosis and Spine Centre, McGill University Health Centre, Montreal, CanadaWillem S Strydom - McGill Scoliosis and Spine Centre, McGill University Health Centre, Montreal, CanadaRudy Reindl - McGill Scoliosis and Spine Centre, McGill University Health Centre, Montreal, CanadaPeter Jarzem - McGill Scoliosis and Spine Centre, McGill University Health Centre, Montreal, CanadaVincent Arlet - Department of Orthopaedics, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, United StatesThomas Steffen - Orthopaedic Research Lab, McGill University Health Centre, Montreal, Canada
- Resource Type
- Journal article
- Publication Details
- Global spine journal, Vol.3(2), pp.85-94
- Publisher
- Georg Thieme Verlag KG; Stuttgart · New York
- DOI
- 10.1055/s-0033-1343073
- PMID
- 24436856
- PMCID
- PMC3854578
- ISSN
- 2192-5682
- eISSN
- 2192-5690
- Language
- English
- Date published
- 06/2013
- Academic Unit
- Orthopedics and Rehabilitation
- Record Identifier
- 9984040362402771
Metrics
27 Record Views