OBJECTIVE: NA. DESIGN: NA. SETTING: NA. POPULATION: NA. INTERVENTIONS: NA. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE(S): NA. RESULTS/CONCLUSIONS: Nurse investigators insist that their research not inflict needless suffering on participants during any phase of a study. When a study involves a sensitive topic such as loss, such suffering is of particular concern. Evaluating the impact of sensitive research simply by looking at decontextualized comments made throughout the interview may provide misleading data about participants' responses to a study. The importance of assessment of risk from psychological distress during all phases of the study cannot be minimized. Knowing strategies that researchers can use to minimize risk, and recognizing self-protective strategies that respondents use, will better protect respondents' psychological well-being even when the interview is on an extremely sensitive topic. [CINAHL abstract]
Journal article
Focus on qualitative methods. "Not as bad as it could have been": assessing and mitigating harm during research interviews on sensitive topics
Research in nursing & health, Vol.21(1), pp.91-97
02/01/1998
DOI: 10.1002/(SICI)1098-240X(199802)21:1<91::AID-NUR10>3.0.CO;2-C
PMID: 9472241
Abstract
Details
- Title: Subtitle
- Focus on qualitative methods. "Not as bad as it could have been": assessing and mitigating harm during research interviews on sensitive topics
- Creators
- Karen KavanaughLioness Ayres - University of Iowa
- Resource Type
- Journal article
- Publication Details
- Research in nursing & health, Vol.21(1), pp.91-97
- DOI
- 10.1002/(SICI)1098-240X(199802)21:1<91::AID-NUR10>3.0.CO;2-C
- PMID
- 9472241
- ISSN
- 0160-6891
- Language
- English
- Date published
- 02/01/1998
- Academic Unit
- Nursing
- Record Identifier
- 9983557485802771
Metrics
221 Record Views