Journal article
Further refinements of the GL(2) converse theorem (vol 45, pg 987, 2013)
The Bulletin of the London Mathematical Society, Vol.47, pp.675-676
08/01/2015
DOI: 10.1112/blms/bdv038
Abstract
Lemma 2.4 of [1] is true, but its proof is not correct in all cases. Precisely, in the proof we defined an n x (n + 1) real matrix M and a vector x(.). is an element of Rn+1 associated to an id`ele class character., and claimed that Mx(.). is an element of Q(n). However, that need not be the case if the number field F is not totally real. To correct for this, we define b(.) = (b(1),..., b(n)), where
Details
- Title: Subtitle
- Further refinements of the GL(2) converse theorem (vol 45, pg 987, 2013)
- Creators
- Andrew R Booker - University of BristolM Krishnamurthy - University of Iowa
- Resource Type
- Journal article
- Publication Details
- The Bulletin of the London Mathematical Society, Vol.47, pp.675-676
- DOI
- 10.1112/blms/bdv038
- ISSN
- 0024-6093
- eISSN
- 1469-2120
- Publisher
- OXFORD UNIV PRESS
- Number of pages
- 2
- Language
- English
- Date published
- 08/01/2015
- Academic Unit
- Mathematics
- Record Identifier
- 9984240877202771
Metrics
8 Record Views