Logo image
Gender Differences in Scholarly Productivity Within Academic Gynecologic Oncology Departments
Journal article   Open access   Peer reviewed

Gender Differences in Scholarly Productivity Within Academic Gynecologic Oncology Departments

Emily K Hill, Rachel A Blake, Jenna B Emerson, Peter Svider, Jean Anderson Eloy, Christina Raker, Katina Robison and Ashley Stuckey
Obstetrics and gynecology (New York. 1953), Vol.126(6), pp.1279-1284
12/2015
DOI: 10.1097/AOG.0000000000001133
PMCID: PMC4868082
PMID: 26551177

View Online

Abstract

To estimate whether there is a gender difference in scholarly productivity among academic gynecologic oncologists. In this cross-sectional study, the academic rank and gender of gynecologic oncology faculty in the United States were determined from online residency and fellowship directories and departmental web sites. Each individual's h-index and years of publication were determined from Scopus (a citation database of peer-reviewed literature). The h-index is a quantification of an author's scholarly productivity that combines the number of publications with the number of times the publications have been cited. We generated descriptive statistics and compared rank, gender, and productivity scores. Five hundred seven academic faculty within 137 U.S. teaching programs were identified. Of these, 215 (42%) were female and 292 (58%) were male. Men had significantly higher median h-indices than women, 16 compared with 8, respectively (P<.001). Women were more likely to be of junior academic rank with 63% of assistant professors being female compared with 20% of full professors. When stratifying h-indices by gender and academic rank, men had significantly higher h-indices at the assistant professor level (7 compared with 5, P<.001); however, this difference disappeared at the higher ranks. Stratifying by the years of active publication, there was no significant difference between genders. Female gynecologic oncologists at the assistant professor level had lower scholarly productivity than men; however, at higher academic ranks, they equaled their male counterparts. Women were more junior in rank, had published for fewer years, and were underrepresented in leadership positions. III.
United States Cross-Sectional Studies Gynecology Humans Biomedical Research - statistics & numerical data Career Mobility Male Faculty, Medical - statistics & numerical data Medical Oncology Bibliometrics Efficiency Sex Factors Publications - statistics & numerical data Female

Details

Logo image