Journal article
Global, regional, and national comparative risk assessment of 84 behavioural, environmental and occupational, and metabolic risks or clusters of risks for 195 countries and territories, 1990-2017: a systematic analysis for the Global Burden of Disease Study 2017
The Lancet (British edition), Vol.392(10159), pp.1923-1994
11/10/2018
DOI: 10.1016/S0140-6736(18)32225-6
PMCID: PMC6227755
PMID: 30496105
Abstract
Background The Global Burden of Diseases, Injuries, and Risk Factors Study (GBD) 2017 comparative risk assessment (CRA) is a comprehensive approach to risk factor quantification that offers a useful tool for synthesising evidence on risks and risk outcome associations. With each annual GBD study, we update the GBD CRA to incorporate improved methods, new risks and risk outcome pairs, and new data on risk exposure levels and risk outcome associations.
Methods We used the CRA framework developed for previous iterations of GBD to estimate levels and trends in exposure, attributable deaths, and attributable disability-adjusted life-years (DALYs), by age group, sex, year, and location for 84 behavioural, environmental and occupational, and metabolic risks or groups of risks from 1990 to 2017. This study included 476 risk outcome pairs that met the GBD study criteria for convincing or probable evidence of causation. We extracted relative risk and exposure estimates from 46 749 randomised controlled trials, cohort studies, household surveys, census data, satellite data, and other sources. We used statistical models to pool data, adjust for bias, and incorporate covariates. Using the counterfactual scenario of theoretical minimum risk exposure level (TMREL), we estimated the portion of deaths and DALYs that could be attributed to a given risk. We explored the relationship between development and risk exposure by modelling the relationship between the Socio-demographic Index (SDI) and risk-weighted exposure prevalence and estimated expected levels of exposure and risk-attributable burden by SDI. Finally, we explored temporal changes in risk-attributable DALYs by decomposing those changes into six main component drivers of change as follows: (1) population growth; (2) changes in population age structures; (3) changes in exposure to environmental and occupational risks; (4) changes in exposure to behavioural risks; (5) changes in exposure to metabolic risks; and (6) changes due to all other factors, approximated as the risk-deleted death and DALY rates, where the risk-deleted rate is the rate that would be observed had we reduced the exposure levels to the TMREL for all risk factors included in GBD 2017.
Findings In 2017,34.1 million (95% uncertainty interval [UI] 33.3-35.0) deaths and 121 billion (144-1.28) DALYs were attributable to GBD risk factors. Globally, 61.0% (59.6-62.4) of deaths and 48.3% (46.3-50.2) of DALYs were attributed to the GBD 2017 risk factors. When ranked by risk-attributable DALYs, high systolic blood pressure (SBP) was the leading risk factor, accounting for 10.4 million (9.39-11.5) deaths and 218 million (198-237) DALYs, followed by smoking (7.10 million [6.83-7.37] deaths and 182 million [173-193] DALYs), high fasting plasma glucose (6.53 million [5.23-8.23] deaths and 171 million [144-201] DALYs), high body-mass index (BMI; 4.72 million [2.99-6.70] deaths and 148 million [98.6-202] DALYs), and short gestation for birthweight (1.43 million [1.36-1.51] deaths and 139 million [131-147] DALYs). In total, risk-attributable DALYs declined by 4.9% (3.3-6.5) between 2007 and 2017. In the absence of demographic changes (ie, population growth and ageing), changes in risk exposure and risk-deleted DALYs would have led to a 23.5% decline in DALYs during that period. Conversely, in the absence of changes in risk exposure and risk-deleted DALYs, demographic changes would have led to an 18.6% increase in DALYs during that period. The ratios of observed risk exposure levels to exposure levels expected based on SDI (O/E ratios) increased globally for unsafe drinking water and household air pollution between 1990 and 2017. This result suggests that development is occurring more rapidly than are changes in the underlying risk structure in a population. Conversely, nearly universal declines in O/E ratios for smoking and alcohol use indicate that, for a given SDI, exposure to these risks is declining. In 2017, the leading Level 4 risk factor for age-standardised DALY rates was high SBP in four super-regions: central Europe, eastern Europe, and central Asia; north Africa and Middle East; south Asia; and southeast Asia, east Asia, and Oceania. The leading risk factor in the high-income super-region was smoking, in Latin America and Caribbean was high BMI, and in sub-Saharan Africa was unsafe sex. O/E ratios for unsafe sex in sub-Saharan Africa were notably high, and those for alcohol use in north Africa and the Middle East were notably low.
Interpretation By quantifying levels and trends in exposures to risk factors and the resulting disease burden, this assessment offers insight into where past policy and programme efforts might have been successful and highlights current priorities for public health action. Decreases in behavioural, environmental, and occupational risks have largely offset the effects of population growth and ageing, in relation to trends in absolute burden. Conversely, the combination of increasing metabolic risks and population ageing will probably continue to drive the increasing trends in non-communicable diseases at the global level, which presents both a public health challenge and opportunity. We see considerable spatiotemporal heterogeneity in levels of risk exposure and risk-attributable burden. Although levels of development underlie some of this heterogeneity, O/E ratios show risks for which countries are overperforming or underperforming relative to their level of development. As such, these ratios provide a benchmarking tool to help to focus local decision making. Our findings reinforce the importance of both risk exposure monitoring and epidemiological research to assess causal connections between risks and health outcomes, and they highlight the usefulness of the GBD study in synthesising data to draw comprehensive and robust conclusions that help to inform good policy and strategic health planning. Copyright (C) 2018 The Author(s). Published by Elsevier Ltd.
Details
- Title: Subtitle
- Global, regional, and national comparative risk assessment of 84 behavioural, environmental and occupational, and metabolic risks or clusters of risks for 195 countries and territories, 1990-2017: a systematic analysis for the Global Burden of Disease Study 2017
- Creators
- Jeffrey D. Stanaway - Institute for Health Metrics and EvaluationAshkan Afshin - Institute for Health Metrics and EvaluationEmmanuela Gakidou - Institute for Health Metrics and EvaluationStephen S. Lim - Institute for Health Metrics and EvaluationDegu Abate - Institute for Health Metrics and EvaluationKalkidan Hassell AbateCristiana Abbafati - Institute for Health Metrics and EvaluationNooshin Abbasi - Institute for Health Metrics and EvaluationHedayat Abbastabar - Institute for Health Metrics and EvaluationFoad Abd-Allah - Institute for Health Metrics and EvaluationJemal Abdela - Institute for Health Metrics and EvaluationAhmed Abdelalim - Institute for Health Metrics and EvaluationIbrahim Abdollahpour - Institute for Health Metrics and EvaluationRizwan Suliankatchi Abdulkader - Institute for Health Metrics and EvaluationMolla Abebe - Institute for Health Metrics and EvaluationZegeye Abebe - University of GondarSemaw F. Abera - Mekelle UniversityOlifan Zewdie Abil - Wollega UniversityHaftom Niguse Abraha - Mekelle UniversityAklilu Roba Abrham - Haramaya UniversityLaith Jamal Abu-Raddad - Institute for Health Metrics and EvaluationNiveen M. E. Abu-Rmeileh - Institute for Health Metrics and EvaluationManfred Mario Kokou Accrombessi - Benin Clin Res Inst IRCB, Dept Epidemiol, Cotonou, BeninDilaram Acharya - Institute for Health Metrics and EvaluationPawan Acharya - Institute for Health Metrics and EvaluationAbdu A. Adamu - Institute for Health Metrics and EvaluationAkikw Awoke Adane - University of GondarOladimeji M. Adebayo - Institute for Health Metrics and EvaluationRufus Adesoji Adedoyin - Institute for Health Metrics and EvaluationVictor Adekanmbi - Institute for Health Metrics and EvaluationZanfina Ademi - Institute for Health Metrics and EvaluationOlatunji Adetokunboh - Institute for Health Metrics and EvaluationMina G. Adib - Institute for Health Metrics and EvaluationAmha Admasie - Institute for Health Metrics and EvaluationJose C. Adsuar - Institute for Health Metrics and EvaluationKossivi Agbelenko Afanvi - Institute for Health Metrics and EvaluationMohsen Afarideh - Institute for Health Metrics and EvaluationGina Agarwal - Institute for Health Metrics and EvaluationAnju Aggarwal - Institute for Health Metrics and EvaluationSargis Aghast Aghayan - Institute for Health Metrics and EvaluationAnurag Agrawal - Institute for Health Metrics and EvaluationSutapa Agrawal - Institute for Health Metrics and EvaluationAlireza Ahmadi - Institute for Health Metrics and EvaluationMehdi Ahmadi - Institute for Health Metrics and EvaluationHamid Ahmadieh - Institute for Health Metrics and EvaluationMuktar Beshir Ahmed - Institute for Health Metrics and EvaluationAmani Nidhal Aichour - Institute for Health Metrics and EvaluationIbtihel Aichour - Institute for Health Metrics and EvaluationMiloud Taki Eddine Aichour - Institute for Health Metrics and EvaluationMohammad Esmaeil Akbari - Institute for Health Metrics and EvaluationTomi Akinyemiju - Institute for Health Metrics and EvaluationNadia Akseer - Institute for Health Metrics and EvaluationZiyad Al-Aly - Institute for Health Metrics and EvaluationAyman Al-Eyadhy - Institute for Health Metrics and EvaluationHesham M. Al-Mekhlafi - Institute for Health Metrics and EvaluationFares AlandabKhurshid Alam - Institute for Health Metrics and EvaluationSamiah Alam - Dalhousie UniversityTahiya Alam - University of WashingtonAlaa Alashi - Institute for Health Metrics and EvaluationSeyed Moayed Alavian - Baqiyatallah Univ Med Sci, Baqiyatallah Res Ctr Gastroenterol & Liver Dis, Tehran, IranKefyalew Addis Alene - Institute for Health Metrics and EvaluationKomal Ali - Institute for Health Metrics and EvaluationSyed Mustafa Ali - Institute for Health Metrics and EvaluationMehran Alijanzadeh - Institute for Health Metrics and EvaluationReza Alizadeh-Navaei - Institute for Health Metrics and EvaluationSyed Mohamed Aljunid - Kuwait UniversityAla'a Alkerwi - Luxembourg Inst Hlth, Dept Populat Hlth, Strassen, LuxembourgFrancois Alla - Institute for Health Metrics and EvaluationUbai Alsharif - Institute for Health Metrics and EvaluationKhalid Altirkawi - Institute for Health Metrics and EvaluationNelson Alvis-Guzman - Institute for Health Metrics and EvaluationAzmeraw T. Amare - Institute for Health Metrics and EvaluationWalid Ammar - Institute for Health Metrics and EvaluationNahla Hamed Anber - Institute for Health Metrics and EvaluationJason A. Anderson - Institute for Health Metrics and EvaluationCatalina Liliana Andrei - Institute for Health Metrics and EvaluationSofia Androudi - Institute for Health Metrics and EvaluationMegbaru Debalkie Animut - Institute for Health Metrics and EvaluationMina Anjomshoa - Institute for Health Metrics and EvaluationMustafa Geleto Ansha - Institute for Health Metrics and EvaluationJosep M. Anto - Institute for Health Metrics and EvaluationCarl Abelardo T. Antonio - Institute for Health Metrics and EvaluationPalwasha Anwari - Institute for Health Metrics and EvaluationLambert Tetteh Appiah - Institute for Health Metrics and EvaluationSeth Christopher Yaw Appiah - Institute for Health Metrics and EvaluationJalal Arabloo - Institute for Health Metrics and EvaluationOlatunde Aremu - Institute for Health Metrics and EvaluationJohan AmlovAl Artaman - Institute for Health Metrics and EvaluationKrishna K. Aryal - Institute for Health Metrics and EvaluationHamid Asayesh - Institute for Health Metrics and EvaluationZerihun Ataro - Institute for Health Metrics and EvaluationMarcel Ausloos - Institute for Health Metrics and EvaluationEuripide F. G. A. Avokpaho - Dongguk University WISEAshish Awasthi - Institute for Health Metrics and EvaluationBeatriz Paulina Ayala Quintanilla - Institute for Health Metrics and EvaluationRakesh Ayer - Institute for Health Metrics and EvaluationTanabe B. Ayuk - Inst Med Res & Med Plant Studies, Ctr Food & Nutr Res, Yaounde, CameroonPeter S. Azzopardi - Institute for Health Metrics and EvaluationGBD 2017 Risk Factor CollaboratorsDavid C Schwebel (Contributor) - Research Administration
- Resource Type
- Journal article
- Publication Details
- The Lancet (British edition), Vol.392(10159), pp.1923-1994
- DOI
- 10.1016/S0140-6736(18)32225-6
- PMID
- 30496105
- PMCID
- PMC6227755
- NLM abbreviation
- Lancet
- ISSN
- 0140-6736
- eISSN
- 1474-547X
- Publisher
- Elsevier
- Number of pages
- 72
- Grant note
- Bill AMP; Melinda Gates Foundation; CGIAR MC_UP_A620_1015; MR/L003120/1; MC_UU_12011/2; MC_U147585827; MC_U137686858; G0400491; MR/M015084/1; MC_U147585819 / MRC; UK Research & Innovation (UKRI); Medical Research Council UK (MRC)
- Language
- English
- Date published
- 11/10/2018
- Academic Unit
- Research Administration
- Record Identifier
- 9984949187902771
Metrics
4 Record Views