Logo image
Guilt and Effortful Control: Two Mechanisms That Prevent Disruptive Developmental Trajectories
Journal article   Peer reviewed

Guilt and Effortful Control: Two Mechanisms That Prevent Disruptive Developmental Trajectories

Grazyna Kochanska, Robin A Barry, Natasha B Jimenez, Amanda L Hollatz and Jarilyn Woodard
Journal of personality and social psychology, Vol.97(2), pp.322-333
08/2009
DOI: 10.1037/a0015471
PMCID: PMC2726045
PMID: 19634978
url
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/2726045View
Open Access

Abstract

Children's guilt associated with transgressions and their capacity for effortful control are both powerful forces that inhibit disruptive conduct. The authors examined how guilt and effortful control, repeatedly observed from toddlerhood to preschool age, jointly predicted children's disruptive outcomes in 2 multimethod, multitrait longitudinal studies ( N s = 57 and 99). Disruptive outcomes were rated by mothers at 73 months (Study 1) and mothers, fathers, and teachers at 52 and 67 months (Study 2). In both studies, guilt moderated effects of effortful control: For highly guilt-prone children, variations in effortful control were unrelated to future disruptive outcomes, but for children who were less guilt prone, effortful control predicted such outcomes. Guilt may inhibit transgressions through an automatic response due to negative arousal triggered by memories of past wrongdoing, regardless of child capacity for deliberate inhibition. Effortful control that engages a deliberate restraint may offset risk for disruptive conduct conferred by low guilt.
guilt observational methods effortful control disruptive conduct longitudinal studies

Details

Metrics

Logo image