Journal article
How child protective services investigators decide to substantiate mothers for failure-to-protect in sexual abuse cases
Journal of child sexual abuse, Vol.15(4), pp.61-81
2006
DOI: 10.1300/J070v15n04_04
PMID: 17200054
Abstract
The purpose of this study was to determine how Child Protective Services (CPS) investigators decide to substantiate mothers for failure-to-protect from sexual abuse. A case-comparison study was used to compare 31 mothers who were and 62 mothers who were not substantiated for failure-to-protect by CPS. The multivariate analysis showed that mothers who did not consistently believe the sexual abuse occurred and who did not consistently act protectively were more likely to be substantiated. In addition, if they knew about the abuse from more than one source were less supportive of the children; and had a substance abuse problem, a mental health problem or were being battered, then they were more likely to be substantiated. Investigators appear to apply criteria consistently to substantiate mothers. doi:10.1300/J070v15n04_04.
Details
- Title: Subtitle
- How child protective services investigators decide to substantiate mothers for failure-to-protect in sexual abuse cases
- Creators
- Carol Coohey - University of Iowa
- Resource Type
- Journal article
- Publication Details
- Journal of child sexual abuse, Vol.15(4), pp.61-81
- DOI
- 10.1300/J070v15n04_04
- PMID
- 17200054
- NLM abbreviation
- J Child Sex Abus
- ISSN
- 1053-8712
- eISSN
- 1547-0679
- Language
- English
- Date published
- 2006
- Academic Unit
- School of Social Work; Injury Prevention Research Center
- Record Identifier
- 9984307255802771
Metrics
24 Record Views