Logo image
Back
How effective is tailored print communication?
Journal article   Open access   Peer reviewed

How effective is tailored print communication?

Celette Skinner, Marci Campbell, Barbara Rimer, Susan Curry and James Prochaska
Annals of behavioral medicine, Vol.21(4), pp.290-298
12/01/1999
DOI: 10.1007/BF02895960
PMID: 10721435
url
https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02895960View
Published (Version of record) Open Access

Abstract

This article reviews the "frist generation" of tailored print communications studies in the published literature, describing the purpose, theoretical framework, sample, research design, message type and source, outcomes measured, and findings of each. Eight studies compared tailored versus similar nontailored print; one compared tailored print versus an alternate intervention, and three included tailored print as one of several intervention components. Although studies varied by behavioral topic, type of tailoring, and measurement of behavioral outcomes, several themes persist. Compared to their nontailored counterparts, tailored print communications have been consistently better remembered, read, and perceived as relevant and/or credible. There is also evidence that tailored print communications are more effective for influenceing health behaviors. Six of the eight tailored/nontailored comparisons found more behavior change among tailored than nontailored recipients. Tailored print communications have also demonstrated effectiveness as an adjunct to other intervention components such as self-help smoking cessation manuals. However, studies comparing tailored print communications with tailoring via other media such as telephone counseling have shown mixed results. Additional research is needed to assess whether the behavioral topic itself may make a difference in whether tailoring is appropriate and effective.[PUBLICATION ABSTRACT]

Details

Metrics

11 Record Views
330 Times Cited - Web of Science
Logo image