Logo image
How often is "often"? Improving assessment of the externalizing spectrum using absolute frequency
Journal article   Open access   Peer reviewed

How often is "often"? Improving assessment of the externalizing spectrum using absolute frequency

Isaac T Petersen, Zachary Demko, Philipp Doebler, Loreen Sabel, Jacob J Oleson and Robert F Krueger
Psychological assessment, Vol.38(4), pp.295-306
04/2026
DOI: 10.1037/pas0001441
PMCID: PMC12695006
PMID: 41343402
url
https://doi.org/10.1037/pas0001441View
Published (Version of record) Open Access

Abstract

Nearly all questionnaires of externalizing problems use vague quantifiers of relative frequency (e.g., rarely/sometimes/often) or true/false statements. Vague quantifiers have many problems, including imprecision and low interpretability. An alternative is numeric quantifiers that quantify, in absolute frequency, how many times the person engaged in the behavior during a given time frame. This study evaluates whether absolute frequency provides utility for assessing the externalizing spectrum. Participants included adults recruited online and college students, for a combined sample of 1,237 adults (290 males; 947 females) spanning 18-92 years of age. A subset of items was adapted from the Externalizing Spectrum Inventory to assess absolute frequency, supplemented with additional items to ensure broad coverage. Using a 30-day reference period, participants indicated how many times they engaged in each behavior per day, per week, in the past month, or in the prior year. Externalizing problems showed age-related decreases from early to later adulthood. On average, men showed greater externalizing problems than women in early and older adulthood; women showed greater externalizing problems than men in middle adulthood. Latent scores derived from absolute frequency items demonstrated convergent validity with a widely used measure of externalizing problems (Adult Self-Report), discriminant validity with respect to internalizing problems, and criterion and incremental validity in relation to functional impairment and inhibitory control. Count data led to greater precision-less uncertainty in the estimate of each person's level of externalizing problems-than dichotomized versions of the items. Findings suggest there is key utility in assessing absolute frequency of externalizing behavior. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2025 APA, all rights reserved).
Adults externalizing behavior problems absolute frequency versus relative frequency numeric quantifiers versus vague quantifiers item response theory

Details

Metrics

28 Record Views
2 readers on Mendeley
Logo image