Logo image
How out-group animosity can shape partisan divisions: A model of affective polarization
Journal article   Open access   Peer reviewed

How out-group animosity can shape partisan divisions: A model of affective polarization

Buddhika Nettasinghe, Allon G Percus and Kristina Lerman
PNAS nexus, Vol.4(3), pgaf082
03/2025
DOI: 10.1093/pnasnexus/pgaf082
PMCID: PMC11927084
PMID: 40125444
url
https://doi.org/10.1093/pnasnexus/pgaf082View
Published (Version of record) Open Access

Abstract

Politically divided societies are also often divided emotionally: people like and trust those with similar political views (in-group favoritism) while disliking and distrusting those with different views (out-group animosity). This phenomenon, called affective polarization, influences individual decisions, including seemingly apolitical choices such as whether to wear a mask or what car to buy. We present a dynamical model of decision-making in an affectively polarized society, identifying three potential global outcomes separated by a sharp boundary in the parameter space: consensus, partisan polarization, and nonpartisan polarization. Analysis reveals that larger out-group animosity compared to in-group favoritism, i.e. , is sufficient for polarization, while larger in-group favoritism compared to out-group animosity, i.e. , is necessary for consensus. We also show that, counterintuitively, increasing cross-party connections facilitates polarization, and that by emphasizing partisan differences, mass media creates self-fulfilling prophecies that lead to polarization. Affective polarization also creates in the opinion landscape where one group suddenly reverses their trends. Our findings aid in understanding and addressing the cascading effects of affective polarization, offering insights for strategies to mitigate polarization.
political psychology opinion dynamics affective polarization social networks homophily

Details

Metrics

Logo image