Logo image
Impact of Robotic Fellowship Experience on Perioperative Outcomes of Robotic-Assisted Laparoscopic Partial Nephrectomy
Journal article   Open access   Peer reviewed

Impact of Robotic Fellowship Experience on Perioperative Outcomes of Robotic-Assisted Laparoscopic Partial Nephrectomy

Michael A Moriarty, Kenneth G Nepple, Chad R Tracy, Michael E Strigenz, Daniel K Lee and James A Brown
Current urology, Vol.9(1), pp.19-23
02/2016
DOI: 10.1159/000442845
PMCID: PMC4789880
PMID: 26989366
url
https://doi.org/10.1159/000442845View
Published (Version of record) Open Access

Abstract

We analyzed differences in patient selection and perioperative outcomes between robotic-fellowship trained and non-fellowship trained surgeons in their initial experience with robotic-assisted laparoscopic partial nephrectomy. Data through surgeon case 10 was analyzed. Forty patients were identified from two fellowship trained surgeons (n = 20) and two non-fellowship trained surgeons (n = 20). Fellowship trained surgeons performed surgery on masses of higher nephrometry score (8.0 vs. 6.0, p = 0.007) and more posterior location (60 vs. 25%, p = 0.03). Retroperitoneal approach was more common (50 vs. 0%, p = 0.0003). Fellowship trained surgeons trended toward shorter warm ischemia time (25.5 vs. 31.0 min, p = 0.08). There was no significant difference in perioperative complications (35 vs. 35%, p = 0.45) or final positive margin rates (0 vs. 15%, p = 0.23). Fellowship experience may allow for treating more challenging and posterior tumors in initial practice and significantly more comfort performing retroperitoneal robotic-assisted laparoscopic partial nephrectomy.
Robotics Fellowship training Partial nephrectomy Laparoscopic surgeries Perioperative period

Details

Metrics

12 Record Views
Logo image