Journal article
Inhibiting IDO pathways to treat cancer: lessons from the ECHO-301 trial and beyond
Seminars in immunopathology, Vol.41(1), pp.41-48
01/01/2019
DOI: 10.1007/s00281-018-0702-0
PMID: 30203227
Abstract
With immunotherapy enjoying a rapid resurgence based on the achievement of durable remissions in some patients with agents that derepress immune function, commonly referred to as checkpoint inhibitors, enormous attention developed around the IDO1 enzyme as a metabolic mediator of immune escape in cancer. In particular, outcomes of multiple phase 1/2 trials encouraged the idea that small molecule inhibitors of IDO1 may improve patient responses to anti-PD1 immune checkpoint therapy. However, recent results from ECHO-301, the first large phase 3 trial to evaluate an IDO1-selective enzyme inhibitor (epacadostat) in combination with an anti-PD1 antibody (pembrolizumab) in advanced melanoma, showed no indication that epacadostat provided an increased benefit. Here we discuss several caveats associated with this failed trial. First is the uncertainty as to whether the target was adequately inhibited. In particular, there remains a lack of direct evidence regarding the degree of IDO1 inhibition within the tumor, and previous trial data suggest that sufficient drug exposure may not have been achieved at the dose tested in ECHO-301. Second, while there is a mechanistic rationale for the combination tested, the preclinical data were not particularly compelling. More efficacious combinations have been demonstrated with DNA damaging modalities which may therefore be a more attractive alternative. Third, as a highly selective IDO1 inhibitor, epacadostat was advanced aggressively despite preclinical genetic evidence of tumors bypassing IDO1 blockade. Indeed, a well-grounded literature starting in 2011 points to targeting strategies that account for both IDO and tryptophan 2,3-dioxygenase as more appealing directions to pursue, including dual inhibitors and inhibitors of nodal downstream effector pathways such as aryl hydrocarbon receptor blockade. Overall, the clinical readout from a single trial with significant limitations is by no means a definitive test for the field. While biomarker information yet to be gleaned from ECHO-301 may yet reveal useful information regarding IDO1 pathway drugs, better rationalized compounds and better rationalized trial designs will be important in the future to accurately gauge medical impact.
Details
- Title: Subtitle
- Inhibiting IDO pathways to treat cancer: lessons from the ECHO-301 trial and beyond
- Creators
- Alexander J. Muller - Lankenau Institute for Medical ResearchMark G. Manfredi - Kyn Therapeut, Cambridge, MA 01238 USAYousef Zakharia - University of IowaGeorge C. Prendergast - Lankenau Institute for Medical Research
- Resource Type
- Journal article
- Publication Details
- Seminars in immunopathology, Vol.41(1), pp.41-48
- Publisher
- Springer Nature
- DOI
- 10.1007/s00281-018-0702-0
- PMID
- 30203227
- ISSN
- 1863-2297
- eISSN
- 1863-2300
- Number of pages
- 8
- Grant note
- Lankenau Medical Center Foundation R01 CA191119 / NCI; United States Department of Health & Human Services; National Institutes of Health (NIH) - USA; NIH National Cancer Institute (NCI) W.W. Smith Trust P30CA086862 / NATIONAL CANCER INSTITUTE; United States Department of Health & Human Services; National Institutes of Health (NIH) - USA; NIH National Cancer Institute (NCI) Main Line Health System
- Language
- English
- Date published
- 01/01/2019
- Academic Unit
- Hematology, Oncology, and Blood & Marrow Transplantation; Internal Medicine
- Record Identifier
- 9984548377002771
Metrics
3 Record Views