Logo image
Back
Issue indivisibility and territorial claims
Journal article   Peer reviewed

Issue indivisibility and territorial claims

Paul Hensel and Sara Mitchell
GeoJournal, Vol.64(4), pp.275-285
12/2005
DOI: 10.1007/s10708-005-5803-3

View Online

Abstract

Early research on contentious issues in world politics suggested that there is an important distinction between largely tangible and largely intangible issues. Tangible issues are thought to be easier to resolve, while intangible issues can fester for long periods of time through fruitless negotiations and repeated armed conflict. Research on territorial issues has suggested that many territorial claims are driven by both tangible and intangible concerns, though, which complicates the analysis of issue tangibility. The authors argue that territorial issues with greater intangible salience (e.g. historical possessions, important homelands, sacred sites, identity ties) should be harder to resolve peacefully and should produce more frequent and severe militarized conflict. Empirical analyses of 191 territorial claims in the Americas and Western Europe (1816–2001) provide mixed support for these expectations. Territorial claims with high intangible salience are significantly more likely to experience militarized disputes and wars. Surprisingly, though, states are much more likely to strike peaceful agreements with their adversaries over territories that are valued for intangible reasons.
 Geography intangible salience Hydrogeology Geography (general) Methodology of the Social Sciences Ecology militarized conflict indivisible issues Environmental Management territory

Details

Metrics

42 Record Views
120 Times Cited - Web of Science
Logo image