Journal article
Larger anesthesia practitioner per operating room ratios are needed to prevent unnecessary non-operative time than to mitigate patient risk: A narrative review
Journal of clinical anesthesia, Vol.96, 111498
09/2024
DOI: 10.1016/j.jclinane.2024.111498
PMID: 38759610
Abstract
When choosing the anesthesia practitioner to operating room (OR) ratio for a hospital, objectives are applied to mitigate patient risk: 1) ensuring sufficient anesthesiologists to meet requirements for presence during critical intraoperative events (e.g., anesthesia induction) and 2) ensuring sufficient numbers to cover emergencies outside the ORs (e.g., emergent reintubation in the post-anesthesia care unit). At a 24-OR suite with each anesthesiologist supervising residents in 2 ORs, because critical events overlapped among ORs, ≥14 anesthesiologists were needed to be present for all critical events on >90% of days. The suitable anesthesia practitioner to OR ratio would be 1.58, where 1.58 = (24 + 14)/24. Our narrative review of 22 studies from 17 distinct hospitals shows that the practitioner to OR ratio needed to reduce non-operative time is reliably even larger. Activities to reduce non-operative times include performing preoperative evaluations, making prompt evidence-based decisions at the OR control desk, giving breaks during cases (e.g., lunch or lactation sessions), and using induction and block rooms in parallel to OR cases. The reviewed articles counted the frequency of these activities, finding them much more common than urgent patient-care events. Our review shows, also, that 1 anesthesiologist per OR, working without assistants, is often more expensive, from a societal perspective, than having a few more anesthesia practitioners (i.e., ratio > 1.00). These results are generalizable among hundreds of hospitals, based on managerial epidemiology studies. The implication of our narrative review is that existing studies have already shown, functionally, that artificial intelligence and monitoring technologies based on increasing the safety of intraoperative care have little to no potential to influence anesthesia or OR productivity. There are, in contrast, opportunities to use sensor data and decision-support to facilitate communication among anesthesiologists outside of ORs to choose optimal task sequences that reduce non-operative times, thereby increasing production and OR efficiency.
•More anesthesia practitioners per operating room may reduce patient risk.•More anesthesia practitioners per operating room does reduce non-operative time.•Many more opportunities to reduce non-operative time than reduce patient risk.•Reducing non-operative time increases anesthesia productivity.•Reducing non-operative time is surgeon and organizational “friendly” too.
Details
- Title: Subtitle
- Larger anesthesia practitioner per operating room ratios are needed to prevent unnecessary non-operative time than to mitigate patient risk: A narrative review
- Creators
- Franklin Dexter - University of IowaRichard H. Epstein - University of MiamiSarah S. Titler - University of Iowa
- Resource Type
- Journal article
- Publication Details
- Journal of clinical anesthesia, Vol.96, 111498
- Publisher
- Elsevier Inc
- DOI
- 10.1016/j.jclinane.2024.111498
- PMID
- 38759610
- ISSN
- 0952-8180
- eISSN
- 1873-4529
- Language
- English
- Electronic publication date
- 05/16/2024
- Date published
- 09/2024
- Academic Unit
- Stead Family Department of Pediatrics; Anesthesia
- Record Identifier
- 9984628158002771
Metrics
10 Record Views