Logo image
Leadless Pacemakers: The "Leading Edge" of Quality of Life in Cardic Electrophysiology
Journal article   Open access   Peer reviewed

Leadless Pacemakers: The "Leading Edge" of Quality of Life in Cardic Electrophysiology

Samuel F. Sears, Elizabeth W Jordan, Zeba Hashmath, Maeve M. Sargeant, John Catanzaro, Rajasekhar Nekkanti and Ghanshyam Shantha
Current cardiology reports, Vol.27(1), p.77
03/31/2025
DOI: 10.1007/s11886-025-02228-5
PMID: 40163218
url
https://doi.org/10.1007/s11886-025-02228-5View
Published (Version of record) Open Access

Abstract

Purpose of the Review Permanent pacemakers (PPMs) are common cardiac implantable devices indicated for patients with bradycardia or tachycardia. Currently, PPMs include both transvenous pacemakers (TV-PM) and leadless pacemakers (L-PM). This paper reviews the existing data on L-PM technology including: a) medical aspects and indications, b) patient experience and quality of life (QOL) outcome studies, and c) recommendations for optimizing patient QOL through enhanced knowledge and shared decision-making. Recent Findings This review includes the seven papers that report on patient-reported outcomes (PRO) in leadless pacemakers and indicate that QOL is as good, if not better, than TV-PM. Existing evidence from descriptive statistics suggests that patients with L-PM report high levels of patient acceptance and satisfaction with esthetic appearance (96%), recovery (91%), and level of physical activity (74%). Summary Leadless pacemakers provide an attractive alternative for the indicated potential patient. The evidence demonstrates the benefits of L-PM such as a minimal implant and lack of leads. Recommendations for future research indicate that electrophysiology-specific metrics are essential and control for the common co-morbidities in the PM population are needed.
Cardiac & Cardiovascular Systems Cardiovascular System & Cardiology Life Sciences & Biomedicine Science & Technology

Details

Metrics

Logo image