Journal article
Macroeconomics, economic crisis and electoral outcomes: A national European pool
Acta politica, Vol.49(4), pp.372-394
10/2014
DOI: 10.1057/ap.2014.12
Abstract
An abundance of comparative survey research argues the presence of economic voting as an individual force in European elections, thereby refuting a possible ecological fallacy. But the hypothesis of economic voting at the aggregate level, with macroeconomics influencing overall electoral outcomes, seems less sure. Indeed, there might be a micrological fallacy at work, with the supposed individual economic vote effect not adding up to a national electoral effect after all. Certainly that would account for the spotty evidence linking macroeconomics and national election outcomes. We examine the possibility of a micrological fallacy through rigorous analysis of a large time-series-cross-sectional data set of European nations. From these results, it becomes clear that the macroeconomy strongly moves national election outcomes, with hard times punishing governing parties, and good times rewarding them. Further, this economy–election connection appears asymmetric, altering under economic crisis. Indeed, we show that economic crisis, defined as negative growth, has much greater electoral effects than positive economic growth. Hard times clearly make governments more accountable to their electorates.
Details
- Title: Subtitle
- Macroeconomics, economic crisis and electoral outcomes: A national European pool
- Creators
- Ruth DassonnevilleMichael S Lewis-Beck
- Resource Type
- Journal article
- Publication Details
- Acta politica, Vol.49(4), pp.372-394
- DOI
- 10.1057/ap.2014.12
- ISSN
- 0001-6810
- eISSN
- 1741-1416
- Language
- English
- Date published
- 10/2014
- Academic Unit
- Political Science
- Record Identifier
- 9984025549002771
Metrics
11 Record Views