Logo image
Macroeconomy and macropartisanship: Economic conditions and party identification
Journal article   Open access

Macroeconomy and macropartisanship: Economic conditions and party identification

Martin Okolikj, Stephen Quinlan and Michael S Lewis-Beck
Politics & Policy, Vol.50(4), pp.700-719
2022
DOI: 10.1111/polp.12473
url
https://doi.org/10.1111/polp.12473View
Published (Version of record) Open Access

Abstract

“It's the economy stupid”—is the phrase that captures the ubiquity of economics in determining election outcomes. Nevertheless, while several studies support the premise of economic voting, a constant critique of valence economic models is that partisan bias contaminates voters' economic perceptions, thus invaliding any independent effect of economic opinions on the vote. Here, we test whether partisanship may itself be endogenous to the macroeconomy. Aggregating data from the Comparative Study of Electoral Systems (CSES), supplemented with European Social Survey (ESS) data to bolster the time analysis, we focus on macropartisanship and find a drop-off of party identifiers for governing parties in tandem with the economic downturn, specifically from rising unemployment. More generally, macropartisanship responds to economic conditions, suggesting that the endogeneity concern between party attachment and valence economic conditions is not unidirectional. That is, while economic perceptions may be influenced by party identification, party identification can be influenced by economic conditions.

Details

Logo image