Logo image
Making AI Accessible to Social Work Researchers: An Exploratory Analysis of Using ChatGPT to Screen Articles for Systematic and Scoping Reviews
Journal article   Peer reviewed

Making AI Accessible to Social Work Researchers: An Exploratory Analysis of Using ChatGPT to Screen Articles for Systematic and Scoping Reviews

Saige M. Addison, Emily D. Campion, Miriam J. Landsman, Christabel L. Rogalin and Christopher A. Veeh
Research on social work practice, Vol.36(4), pp.364-381
05/2026
DOI: 10.1177/10497315251357190

View Online

Abstract

Purpose: Title and abstract screening is one of the most time- and resource-intensive steps in systematic and scoping reviews (SRs); however, artificial intelligence (AI) can accelerate this step without sacrificing methodological rigor. We test ChatGPT-4o's ability to accurately screen citations and present an accessible approach, tailored to social work scholars with limited AI experience. Method: Through prompt engineering, we tested how two vectorization techniques, three algorithms, and class weighting impact ChatGPT-4o's classification accuracy for article inclusion in two SRs compared to models run in a native Python environment (Jupyter Notebook). Results: ChatGPT-4o-generated models were comparable to Jupyter Notebook, with the bag of words or term frequency-inverse document frequency and logistic regression models performing well. Additionally, adjusting for class imbalance improved performance across samples and models. Discussion: This approach is effective, promoting accessibility for researchers and practitioners. We encourage future researchers to replicate and extend the use of chatbots in the screening process.
systematic reviews scoping reviews abstract screening artificial intelligence supervised machine learning

Details

Metrics

12 Record Views
Logo image