Methods and implications of canopy base height characterization for modeling crown fire potential

Colin N. Mast; Lilian Vallet; Matthew D. Hurteau; Harold S. J. Zald; Gavin M. Jones; George A. Woolsey; Wade T. Tinkham; Chad M. Hoffman; Emily J. Francis

doi:10.1186/s42408-026-00567-4

Back

Methods and implications of canopy base height characterization for modeling crown fire potential

Journal article

Open access

Peer reviewed

Methods and implications of canopy base height characterization for modeling crown fire potential

Colin N. Mast, Lilian Vallet, Matthew D. Hurteau, Harold S. J. Zald, Gavin M. Jones, George A. Woolsey, Wade T. Tinkham, Chad M. Hoffman and Emily J. Francis

Fire ecology, Vol.22(1), 117

08/19/2026

DOI: 10.1186/s42408-026-00567-4

Files and links (1)

url

https://doi.org/10.1186/s42408-026-00567-4View

Published (Version of record) Open Access

Abstract

Canopy base height (CaBH; distinct from tree-level crown base height, CrBH) represents the lowest height at which canopy fuel, aggregated across multiple tree crowns, can propagate fire vertically and serves as an essential variable for modeling crown fire transition and hazard to inform fuel reduction treatment planning. However, as fire models have been applied to increasingly diverse forest structures and remote sensing technologies have advanced, a variety of methods for characterizing CaBH have emerged. Here, we review the primary approaches for CaBH characterization using field observation, airborne Lidar, and satellite-based mapping. We then apply these methods across four conifer forest types in northern New Mexico (USA) to evaluate how method choice and forest structure influence CaBH characterization and predicted fire behavior using a Rothermel-Van Wagner crown fire modeling framework. Our results show that CaBH characterizations vary widely among measurement methods (mean within-plot range = 6 m), and that these differences lead to substantial variation in predicted torching index (mean within-plot range = 14 km h −1 ), demonstrating that method choice strongly shapes modeled crown fire hazard. Further, we found that divergence among methods increases with tree height variability. These results highlight the need for forest managers and fire behavior modelers to be deliberate in selecting and justifying their choice of CaBH characterization, particularly in structurally complex forests.

Ecology

Forestry

Life Sciences

Biomedical and Life Sciences

Review

Details

Title: Subtitle: Methods and implications of canopy base height characterization for modeling crown fire potential
Creators: Colin N. Mast - Colorado State University
Lilian Vallet - Colorado State University
Matthew D. Hurteau - University of New Mexico
Harold S. J. Zald - Pacific Northwest Research Station
Gavin M. Jones - University of Iowa
George A. Woolsey - Colorado State University
Wade T. Tinkham - Rocky Mountain Research Station
Chad M. Hoffman - Colorado State University
Emily J. Francis - Colorado State University
Resource Type: Journal article
Publication Details: Fire ecology, Vol.22(1), 117
DOI: 10.1186/s42408-026-00567-4
ISSN: 1933-9747
eISSN: 1933-9747
Publisher: Springer International Publishing
Grant note: Joint Fire Science Program: JFSP 22-2-02-14 Colorado State University
This work was supported by the Joint Fire Science Program under Project JFSP 22-2-02-14 and Colorado State University.
Language: English
Date published: 08/19/2026
Academic Unit: School of Earth, Environment, and Sustainability
Record Identifier: 9985222716202771

Metrics

1 Record Views