Journal article
Misconduct in the Prosecution of Severe Crimes: Theory and Experimental Test
Social psychology quarterly, Vol.69(1), pp.97-107
03/2006
DOI: 10.1177/019027250606900107
Abstract
Prosecutorial misconduct involves the intentional use of illegal or improper methods for attaining convictions against defendants in criminal trials. Previous research documented extensive errors in the prosecution of severe crimes. A theory formulated to explain this phenomenon proposes that in serious cases, increased pressure to convict encourages misconduct; further, serious cases increase perceptions of the suspect's guilt, which facilitate justification of the misconduct. A controlled laboratory experiment allows tests of theoretically derived predictions while controlling for extraneous factors common in naturally occurring settings. University undergraduate participants were assigned randomly to prosecute a contrived case of murder or assault; otherwise the two cases were identical. Results showed that participants improperly withheld exculpatory evidence from the defense more often in the murder case than in the assault case. Further, participants prosecuting the murder case expressed a stronger belief in the defendant's guilt than did participants in the assault case. Implications for future research in naturally occurring settings are discussed.
Details
- Title: Subtitle
- Misconduct in the Prosecution of Severe Crimes: Theory and Experimental Test
- Creators
- Jeffrey W. Lucas - University of Maryland, College ParkCorina Graif - Sociology and CriminologyMichael J. Lovaglia - University of Iowa
- Resource Type
- Journal article
- Publication Details
- Social psychology quarterly, Vol.69(1), pp.97-107
- DOI
- 10.1177/019027250606900107
- ISSN
- 0190-2725
- eISSN
- 1939-8999
- Language
- English
- Date published
- 03/2006
- Academic Unit
- Sociology and Criminology
- Record Identifier
- 9984305978902771
Metrics
6 Record Views